Search Insurance

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Business and Industry in Liverpool


The commercial life of Liverpool has been developing over many centuries. Originally a small fishing port it went on to become one of the great ports of the world. Now, as is the case with many large cities that developed during and after the industrial revolution, Liverpool acknowledges that some of its old industries are gone and others are changed forever. With that attitude the city is promoting itself as a city that national and international companies would want to invest in. The following are some examples of the industrial and business life of the re-developing Liverpool.

Liverpool has for many decades had automotive industry companies working in it. The Ford plant at Halewood employs a little under 1000 people and is currently used as an assembly plant for Jaguar X-Type vehicles and production of the GetRag transmission system for Fiesta, Fusion and Transit models. The biggest automotive plant in Liverpool is currently the GM plant at Ellesmere Port which was opened in June 1964 to produce the Vauxhall Viva. The plant is currently used to produce models of the Vauxhall/Opel Astra and its 5,500 employees produce around 180,000 vehicles a year.

As a major UK port, the importation of food and drink through Liverpool inevitably led to the growth of food and drink businesses in the area. Almost a speciality of Liverpool was the sugar trade from the West Indies, so it is of little surprise that The Billington Food Group, who import and trade in sugar, should be located in Liverpool. Convenient for transatlantic trade from Canada the port of Liverpool was also convenient for landing Salmon fish; subsequently in the 1880s Simpson and Roberts founded the Princes Foods Company, a name synonymous with canned fish products in the UK. The company now deals in a range of food products and with a turn-over of £750 million a year the company plays an important part in the local Liverpool economy. Another nationally well known food name is Jacobs, of Cream Cracker fame. Now part of the United Biscuits it still has a major production plant at Aintree along with the Groups Business Centre at Binns Road in the city.

Professional and financial services accounts for over 20% of the Merseyside gross domestic product. Liverpool city offers the perfect centre for these operations enabling rapid networking and development. Amongst the more well known names in these sectors with bases in Liverpool are - in accounting: Deloitte and Touche, Earnst and Young, KPMG and Price Waterhouse Coopers. In finance - Coutts and the best known insurance company in Liverpool is The Royal Liver Insurance Services. Now a multi-billion pound company it was founded in 1850 primarily to give the poor an opportunity to ensure they could afford a decent burial for their loved ones. So successful was their business that by 1911 they had built and moved into the Royal Liver building, at Pier Head, which was to become a symbol for the whole of the city attaining an iconic status to Liverpool residents. Liverpool has become a magnet for UK based call-centres with companies as large and diverse as BT, United Airways, Barclays Direct Loan Service, Norwich Union Direct and Swiss Life all being located there.

The Merseyside area is well known as the home of petro-chemical companies with ICI having a large plant across the Wirral in Cheshire. GlaxcoSmithKline is one of the larger pharmaceutical / Life Sciences companies with a base in Liverpool. Others include Novartis and ML Laboratories in nearby Warrington. In total, Life science companies employ over 4000 people in the area.

Across Merseyside nearly 2000 people are employed in the creative industries of music, film, drama. The Liverpool Institute of Performing Arts attracts students from all over the country to study in its world class facilities. The expansion in media companies wishing to use Liverpool has resulted in the city council operating a Liverpool Film Office to support and co-ordinate filming events. Liverpool is also the home of Lime pictures which produces 'Hollyoaks" alongside other well known national TV programmes. Telecommunications and ICT companies bring in about £1 billion to the local economy every year. The continuing growth in this sector being one of the key drivers behind the regeneration of Liverpool. BT, Cable & Wireless and Marconi being amongst the companies with development centres in the area.

An industry vastly changed from what it was even 20 years ago is Liverpool's maritime industry. Whilst it now only employs 6000 people, compared to nearly 40,000 in the early 20th century, the Port of Liverpool is the third largest port in the UK by tonnage handled and is in the top 10 of container ports in northern Europe. Whilst the days of large transatlantic liners docking at Liverpool are over, the port is still used by P&O Ferries for its routes to and from Ireland.




For more free information about Liverpool go to Liverpool Dating or for dating in Liverpool visit http://www.liverpool-dating.co.uk




America - Would Our Ancestors Recognize It?


I am glad that my beloved late grandfather is no longer around to see America-the country he once loved. He was a naval officer that served his country during WWII as a pilot. As children, my grandparents didn't rely on government subsidies to survive. They worked in fields, grew their own food, made their own clothing, and solved their own problems. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Americans rose up against a common enemy: the axis powers of Nazi Germany, Italy and Japan.

If you look at old pictures from the WWII era, you will see dirty faced American men and women standing side-by-side with their sleeves rolled up in some filthy factory. At the time, those people were considered your average hard-working Americans. They beat the sun out of bed and went to work. If you take a close look at the photographs, you will see many of them were lean, strong and walked with their heads held high. It was definitely American ingenuity at its finest. Unfortunately, we no longer live in the same America my grandfather once knew.

America has become the unwanted houseguest that sleeps on the sofa and raids your refrigerator. We are the despised meddling neighbor that has 911 on speed dial. We are the preacher that neglects his own family for his congregation. Long gone is the reputation of Americans known as producers. The world now looks at Americans as a nation of whining consumers. We ship our jobs overseas and depend on foreign oil like a crack addict depends on his dealer.

There is barely any resemblance between our America and the one my grandfather knew. America has become a society of fat, rude, obnoxious, and lazy people who file lawsuits whenever someone hurts their feelings. We kill, maim, destroy, lie, cheat, and steal for personal gain. And when caught, we blame it on our parents because no one hugged us as children. We are a nation of blameless people who never accept responsibility for anything. We blame our problems on everyone else except for the person in the mirror.

The recent passing of "Obamacare" proves my point about America. Since when did we decide that we need the government to subsidize our health care? Although some people think this is a great moment in history, they are only looking through rose colored glasses. I don't think it has settled in that working taxpayers will be forced to pay for it. And when this happens, the doctors and health insurance will then be forced to raise their prices to keep up with the growing population.

Some people don't have insurance because they can't afford it. Health insurance is as much of a right as a driver's license. So what's next? Will the government start mandating that everyone drives an odorless green car? And if you don't own one, will you be forced to buy one?

Health insurance has just become another freedom we have relinquished back to the government. We are on the heels of becoming a Socialist nation like England and Canada-Nations that reward success and hard work with more taxes. What people forget is that once you start relinquishing your freedoms, you eventually become China or Cuba.

Don't be surprised when the government starts regulating what type of home you can buy or what you can name your children. Our politicians have put us in debt with the Red Chinese, a communist nation that laughs at our failing economy. It's because the Chinese know that our foolishness is their gain. Sadly, the America our ancestors and founding fathers once knew has gone M.I.A




Marc Hoover has a Bachelor of Science degree from Indiana Wesleyan University and has more than eleven years experience working in social services. Marc also wrote the humorous dating book titled You Need A Cellmate Not A Soulmate, published by Ladybug Books. Marc's book is currently available at http://www.Ladybugbooks.com and http://www.Amazon.com. Additionally, Marc manages two websites: A dating website titled Socialhearts ( http://www.Socialhearts.com ) and Letters Beyond Heaven ( http://www.Lettersbeyondheaven.com ), a site to remember and honor deceased family members and friends. Please feel free to stop by either site with any recommendations or comments.




10 Simple Things That Will Improve the Average American's Life


"The only thing that one really knows about human nature is that it changes. Change is the one quality we can predicate of it. The systems that fail are those that rely on the permanency of human nature, and not on its growth and development. The error of Louis XIV was that he thought human nature would always be the same. The result of his error was the French Revolution. It was an admirable result." Oscar Wilde

Some time back I wrote about the possibility of a repeat of the French Revolution in the US. The US under the Bush Administration had pushed the limits of greed and corruption while veiling their actions in secrecy. Society has always existed in a semi stable stage of class warfare. Since the Reagan Revolution government policies have favored the wealthy and large corporate interests over that of the middle class to determent of all.

The wealth of the US and the world is built on the backs of the middle class. Yes, innovation comes from the very few and creates wealth beyond belief. Yet without a broad market all the innovation in the world will not find a sales outlet. The proper feedback from the creation to the consumption of product is what builds wealth of a society. This is a fact lost on Japan and China. Repressed domestic markets create instability in the emerging manufacturing economies. It is easy to copy what others produced but difficult to bridge the social gaps necessary for sustainability.

This brings us to the new Obama budget. Maybe there is something wrong with my accounting, but the last Clinton budget was balanced with a surplus at $1.6 trillion. The last Bush deficit budget was $3.1 trillion and now Obama comes in with the $3.6 trillion budget after putting the stimulus and the bank bailout on the previous budget! Perhaps the Obama budget is a discount on the last year of the Bush Administration when you add in off the budget costs of the stimulus, the bailout and the Iraq War, which probably puts Bush's last year in the $5.6 Trillion region.

No matter how one does the math Obama is taking over a country that has not grown much since Clinton while more than doubling the last balanced budget. In a case of mone-terrorists gone no one asks what the average US citizen really needs. For without asking this question we cannot begin to address the policy changes necessary to end the spiraling down of the financial system. Let's look at ten simple things that would greatly improve the average person's life.

o A balanced budget. You do not cure alcoholism by continuing to drink into a dysfunctional state. An unbalanced budget depreciates the value of the dollar contributing to the deflation that is undermining the financial system. Such policy transfers debt to our children and grandchildren causing far more harm than all the failed socialist policies of the last 40 years. It should be a crime for any governmental agency to incur debt other than revenue bonds for infrastructure projects. All such development bonds should have a revenue resource to retire them outside of the general fund.

o Lower Energy Costs. A larger and larger portion of middle class income has been transferred to external energy costs while conservation in the name of environmentalism has prevented infrastructure development. Such policies have actually led to greater pollution. Instead of speculative Cap and Trade, impose an import tariff on all imported energy sources outside of NAFTA. Use the import tariff to develop internal energy infrastructure. Such a premium would over time reverse dependence on foreign sources while boosting the internal economies of the US and its closest neighbors.

o Raise the Minimum Wage. The minimum wage has stagnated. In the 1960s a person working for minimum wage could pay rent, own a car, buy groceries and have a few dollars left over at the end of the week. As we learned from the 1930s depression nothing stalls the economy faster than lowering wages below subsistence. Such creates a cycle of destruction of the working class, increasing crime and contributes to a lack of pricing power for producers.

o Reduce Income Taxes on Median Income to Zero. Such will substantially shift the income tax burden to upper incomes as occurred in the 1950-60s. However, eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax and allow investment deductions against ordinary income as long as those investments are made in the US. Thus those consuming, pay higher taxes, while those saving for the future do not. Tax capital gains as ordinary income only when the money is removed from the investment markets. This would in effect provide 401K protection from taxes for all investment gains until the money is consumed.

o Fight Corruption at All Levels. The history of the decline of all societies is one of ever increasing and tolerated corruption. Those in positions of power must be held doubly responsible for corrupt activity from taking bribes, ignoring laws and nepotism. Unless those at the upper level are held accountable to a very high standard then those at the lower level will never respect and cooperate with government. Put a one year moratorium on passing any new laws. Use this period to eliminate and consolidate existing laws with the goal of streamlining and expediting the legal process making it accessible to the average citizen. Eliminate all victimless crimes and replace those necessary for regulation with taxes on "sin". The 'all governments' goal must be to make every street in the US safe for anyone to walk down any time, day or night. This is the only way to fight terrorism.

o Tax Private Education. It is shameful that the government has so deteriorated the quality of public schools that the president and virtually all upper income people use private schools. Schools are a cooperative effort with the smarter and better prepared students pushing those of less academic ability. When the top tier of students are removed from a school system the average quality of education declines. By taxing private education there would be more money and higher qualified students for public schools. The more involved parents become the better the public education raising the bar for every one.

o Pass Usury Laws. Cap credit card, all consumer loans and mortgage interest rates at 10%. The current structure of the US credit system penalizes the least capable forcing them into a continued high level of debt. If loan companies cannot make money at 10% then they will not make the loans. This will require the lower level of society to rely on pay as you go debit cards. It also will prevent speculation in times of high inflation. Outlaw negative amortization on all loans.

o Eliminate the Deduction for Charitable Contributions. It is fundamentally unfair for me to be taxed higher for subsidizing your charity no matter how noble the cause. Outlaw corporate contributions to all charities. Too often they are used as bribes. The more a corporation concentrates on its primary purpose of delivering the highest quality product to the individual the more jobs it will create.

o Birth Right. It depreciates the value of citizenship when anyone one can sneak into country, give birth to a new US citizen and then applies for public assistance. Births from US citizens from 1970 have remained flat reflecting an affluent society, while all the growth in population since has been from immigration and much of that from illegal immigration. Change the definition of a natural born citizen to one born of at least one US citizen.

o Health Insurance. Provide a $300 / month universal major medical insurance policy to all families and citizens with a $2,500 deductible and requirements for periodic examines. Outlaw all governmental agencies - local, state and federal from providing more coverage with elected officials. The heart break of the uninsured or working poor is in not the day to day costs, but the costs that can bankrupt ones savings in an emergency. Eliminate pre-existing conditions. If the commercial health insurance system can provide such coverage to a family of four then it can be universal to everyone in the nation - even Wal-Mart workers. Convert Medicare and the VA to the same system and eliminate health insurance from liability for all other types of insurance such as auto and home owners.

Until the nation as a whole abandons the current monetary thinking that has created the current financial crisis and concentrates on creating and encouraging the protection of wealth, then there will continue to be spasms that effect and destabilize all hard working people.




Eric Von Baranov is the Founder & CEO of the Kondratyev Theory Letter (The Letter). Started in 1974, The Letter follows the 50+ year economic long wave theory as originally developed by the 1920s Russian economist Nicolai Kondratieff. Adherence to this cycle provides Eric with insight on a wide range of topics, including economics, politics, culture and technology. Eric has been published by Minyanville.com and the Psychic Investigator. He sponsors an online conference at http://www.kondratyev.com Please note that a new and improved web site is currently under development.




Globalisation - Challenges And Opportunities


INTRODUCTION

Globalisation has become the need of the day for every country of the world - be it small or big, developed or developing nation, Globalisation, which started as back as 1980, has spurred due to technological advancement in the areas of transport and communication and by the selection of big developing nations to bring necessary improvement in investment climate and to open up to international trade and investment. The most encouraging aspect is that for the first time, poor nations are trying hard with desire and commitment to harness the potential and opportunities of their huge labour to break into world markets for manufactured products and services. Since the initiation of globalisation, manufactures have witnessed a rise from less than 25 percent to 80 percent. The major contribution to this increase is made out by Brazil, China, Hungry, India and Mexico.

GLOBALISATION AND INDIAN ECONOMY

24 developing nations, which cover 3 billion people, have doubled their ratio of trade to income over the last two decades. Countries that undertook globalisation at a faster rate have increased their per capita income from 1 percent in the decade of 60s to 3 percent in the decade of 70s, 4 percent in the decade of 80s, and 5 percent in the decade of 90s.

According to the World Bank, in the past decade, the number of the poor in the world (excluding China) rose by more than 100 million. Another study found that during 1990-98, 36 countries had average annual growth of 2.3 percent, 34 countries had a growth of 1.9 percent and 39 countries had no growth with 15 countries experiencing falling living standards.

The World Bank holds the view that the impact of growth on poverty has varied according to the pattern of investment. For example, in India, a given growth rate has cut poverty in some states by four to five times as much as in others. Those states which invested heavily in education and health saw a much higher rate of reduction in poverty. This point of view has been adopted by almost all donors for the disbursement of their assistance to developing countries.

The free trade and investment policies continue to be under attack from many quarters, in that the realities of the developing world are not taken into account. Under attack also are the blatant hypocrisy and double standards that govern the behaviour of rich countries towards the poor countries.

The developing world has not received a fair share of benefits because the rich countries have not kept their part of the agreement reached at the Uruguay Round, under which they had pledged to reduce subsidies to their agriculture by 36 percent in return for the lowering of tariffs on agricultural imports by the developing countries. While the developing countries reduced their tariffs by 50 percent, the rich countries subsidies remained unchanged.

Similarly, the industrial countries had agreed to phase out the protectionist Multi-Fibre Agreement by 2005, But 30 percent of textiles and clothing skills face significant restrictions even in 2004. The average tariff on these goods is 11 percent, which is three times as high as on other industrial goods. South Asia alone loses $2 billion a year due to these tariffs.

Agriculture and textiles together account for 70 percent of the poor world's exports. Developing countries lose nearly $100 billion a year due to rich countries' export subsidies and trade barriers. In rich countries, tariffs on goods from poor countries are four times higher than on goods from rich countries. If poor countries' goods get free access to rich country markets, and if the later remove all subsidies, it would add $1.5 billion by 2015 to poor countries' income, and lift 300 million people from the rank of the poor.

WHY INDIA HAS BEEN LAGGING BEHIND?

It is generally said that India has failed in globalising its economy and therefore, real fruits of globalisation have not been reaped out by the common man. Development economists of India put two arguments in this respect. First, inability of Indian economy to contain fiscal deficit is resulting into stagnation of the country's economy. Second, failure to reform the structure of Indian economy so that sustainable growth is ensured in the future. These issues have far reaching effect on the globalisation of Indian economy. There are two emerging parameters on the basis of which failure could be judged. First, a relatively small change in the components of exports away from agricultural to sophisticated manufactures. Second, decrease in the inflow of FDI.

During the year 1990-91 i.e. pre-liberalisation, agriculture had contributed 24 percent in India's total exports. The share of sophisticated manufactures was 21.8 percent and remaining share i.e. 54.2 percent was of light manufactures. On the other side of it, in the year 1999-2000, the relative share of agriculture was 17 percent ( a decline of 7 percent). The relative share of sophisticated manufactures stood at 29.8 percent (a rise of 7 percent). The relative share of light manufactures remained at 54.2 percent. This means during a span of ten years there was only 7 percent increase in sophisticated manufactures and from that it could be concluded there has been no appreciable degree of globalisation in Indian economy.

Added to this, if these trends are compared with economic transformation in East Asia during the period under review, India is nowhere and it proves to be a 'glimmer'. The major factor attributed to these trends is insignificant role played by foreign and joint ventures in the promotion of India's exports during the period under reference.

Foreign direct investment (FDI), one of the most vital instruments for globalising Indian economy, is partially responsible for the failure of globalisation in India. This is because FDI inflows to India never exceeded from a level of US$3.3 billion as against a minimum need of at least US$ 10 billion annually. India is being considered a nation inveterately hostile to FDI to India in comparison to total FDI approved. From the year 1991 to 2001 only 21.7 percent has been actual inflow to India. This is due to lack of proper initiation and implementation of 'second generation' reforms. These reforms relate to factor market and administrative system under which firms have to work.

Indian economy has also failed to link to global economy. It is essential on the part of Indian economy to attract investment not only to strategic industries but also to simple industries. China did a right thing by inviting investment in simple industries.

The other viewpoint in regard to globalisation of Indian economy is that Indian economy globalisation is a 'mixed blessing'. A better alternative is not to opt out of the process of globalisation, but to come out and evolve an appropriate framework to have maximum benefits from the existing international trade and investment scenario. In this regard, it has become imperative to understand the gains and losses on one hand and to study the benefits and dangers on the other hand.

There is an urgent need to cooperate with other developing nations to bring the desired change in the existing international trade environment. Simultaneously, India must identify and strengthen its comparative advantages. This would result into spirit of meeting the challenges of globalisation. India has miles to go to reap out the benefits of globalisation for all its inhabitants. Globalisation of Indian economy must be based on the premise of equality of opportunities for all.

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

It is true that the present -day world does not give us any option except to join the process of globalisation, we should along with other developing countries, find ways and means of devising policies and programmers which really help the poor nations and the poor among these nations. We should fight for a more just and equitable world order and develop the strength and unity to resist imposition of unequal treaties and discriminatory trade policies. India signed the WTO accord but the Indian industry as well as trade circles are not fully aware even today of the commitments made by the country.

In fact, the problem with globalisation is that a few may benefit and majority may be worse off. As such, it is necessary that government takes an active part in managing and tackling it. In recent times, an important aspect of globalisation has been outsourcing of jobs, particularly hi-tech jobs, by developed countries like America to developing countries like India. This has been favourable to America as it can now specialise in areas of competitive advantage involving skilled labour and advanced technology. It is, however, argued that today America is producing lesser number of engineers than, say, India or China even as they may e to some disadvantage either because of poor training or such other factors. But then, this disadvantage is more than offset by the wage differentials, causing unemployment amongst American engineers.

It is thus that America has to grapple with the challenges of adjusting to globalisation and at the same time, be more sensitive to the plight of developing countries. No wonder, globalisation can also boomerang, limiting the growth process in developed countries in case workers are unemployed or their living condition become worse off because of outsourcing.

What is more, the main driving forces of present-day globalisation are the market and the return on investment. Only countries with high growth and good prospects or attractive returns have been drawn within the fold of global trade and investment flows. Developing countries attract only 30 percent of global investment flows, but just 20 countries in the developing world attract over 85 percent of total foreign direct investment flows and 94 percent of portfolio investment. Globalisation has thus eluded the rest of the developing countries inspite of drastic liberalisation of their economic policies.

It can also be said that as a result of globalisation, there has been large concentration of activities within certain geographical confines like those of the Asia pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) and the European Union (EU) and this has widened the disparity between the rich and the poor countries. The income-gap between the top 20 percent of the world's population in the highest-income countries and bottom 20 percent of world's Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the latter accounts for only one percent. And there is no guarantee that more liberalisation by the developing countries will help to narrow this gap.

As part of trade reforms, the tariff and non-tariff barriers have been lowered gradually. India's agreement with the WTO norms has resulted in the country removing the quantitative restrictions on various items and from April 2003 free import of various items has been allowed.

No doubt, an impression has been gaining ground that many an economic ill are due to globalisation. Also, it is felt that increased cross-border trade will adversely affect Indian economy. Moreover, Indian companies fear that they are going to be easy targets for takeover by foreign companies. There may be an element of truth in these perceptions but not all of them may be real.

It is also true that liberalisation of trade and investments increased capital flows and the resultant competition also leads to higher economic growth. Evidence suggests that open economies have prospered better than those economies which have adopted protective practices, as in the case of many of the South East Asian economies.

Therefore, India should rise to avail itself of the opportunities of globalisation. Indian business cannot perpetually live behind protective barriers. It is necessary to push Indian companies into global competition and break their lethargy. To withdraw from globalisation would be an opportunity lost.

No wonder then, however, a first class infrastructure network has to be provided for Indian industry and business so that they become effectively competitive in the global market. Along with that, some law pertaining to labour and production need to be changed while some new have to be introduced keeping in view the global standards that need to be achieved. Surely, by leaving these and other problems unattended, it cannot be expected that Indian industry and business will be able to rise to meet the global challenges.

Of no less concern is the fact that huge global corporations enjoy sufficient financial cloud to erode the regulatory powers of nations and ride roughshod over the rights of individuals to determine their future. Whereas the post-colonialism had held out the promise of an equlitarian world order and globalisation was supposed to deliver economic equality among nations, the reality is to the contrary. In the post-globalisation world in which we live today, inequality is on the increase.

It is said globalisation's driving idea is free market capitalism. Like the cold war, globalisation also has its own set of economic rules which revolve around opening deregulation and privatisation of economic activities. In the era of globalisation, we are all connected as we reach for the internet but nobody is totally in charge. If the defining perspective of cold war was division, it was integration for globalisation. Once a country makes the leap into the system of globalisation, its elites try to locate themselves in a global context.

The financial sector reforms have been particularly significant and banks are now reorienting their strategy to compete with international players. The insurance sector has been opened up only recently and the forces of competition are already coming into play. Industrial licensing has been more or less abolished and the role of private capital has been enhanced in various sectors.

Also, in India's corporate sector some kind of discontinuity is visible as global competition is knocking at their doors. Foreign investments are sometimes looked upon with suspicion and yet they seem to be crucial for modernisation. Now time has come when we should aim at making Indian companies as global companies with the vast pool of trained manpower and skills available in the country. The objective should be to build Indian brands and products which are recognised through out the world.

Nevertheless, all this calls for restructuring on a scale, which has been untried till now in so far as the economy and corporate sector are concerned. The level of performance would need not be sustained by constant innovation, cost reduction and better quality. It has to be recognised that as a consequence of globalistion, free roaming across the global economy by multinationals has encouraged many developing nations to liberalize at great speed. Therefore, mergers and acquisitions have eroded competition and developed monopolistic tendencies, vitiating all fruitful results of a global environment.

INDIA SHOULD CAPITALISE ON ITS STRENGTH

Understanding the current status of globalisation is necessary for setting the course for the future. The main point here is that globalisation is still an evolving concept, and up to now it has been shaped largely by the rich and the powerful countries to assert their advantages in the fields of manufacturing, services and finance. The developing countries have not been able to secure as much benefit from their primary strengths in agriculture and labour as they should have. Although India took the initiative to echo its concern in the Cancun agenda, this subject is yet to again its rightful attention.

It is to be noted that developing countries are not homogeneous. Each country has its own unique strengths, weaknesses and concerns, and each needs to frame its policies accordingly. For India to secure its due share of gains from the globalisation process, it needs to capitalise on its strengths.

India is the second largest country and the largest democracy in the world. Its record on freedom of speech, association and worship is quite impressive. It has well-developed legal and financial institutions and infrastructure, and a large industrial and sophisticated scientific base. Its higher education system is large and capable of achieving excellence.

The most important strength of India is its well-trained but surplus man power which is English-speaking and Western-oriented. It also has a vast surplus of low-skill and unskilled manpower. India's gain could be enormous if it were allowed to export this manpower freely. There would also be other significant economic, political and social gains.

1. International trade tends to grow between manpower sending and receiving countries.

2. When the number of immigrants from a country/region becomes noticeably large and/or economically powerful, they tend to become a political force in their new country.

3. Out sourcing tends to encourage people to obtain education and learn about other countries. As a result, significant outsourcing can become a powerful force for the spread of education.

CONCLUSION

During 1990 and 2003 the volume of world trade has increased and the high and middle income countries have managed to increase their share in world trade. This has happened mainly because of opening up of economies and globalisation. Moreover, the middle income countries have invited more Foreign Direct Investment during the period. In contrast with this, the per capita GDP of the low income countries has marginally increased. The economic inequality has widened between different income groups. Therefore one may be tempted to conclude that the globalisation has not trickled down to the low income countries. In other words globalisation has been confined to developed countries and developing countries have been able to participate in the process.

However, globalisation should not be accused for losing share of the low income countries. These countries suffer from internal problems like rapid rise in population, infrastructure bottle necks, weak financial markets and so on. More access to globalisation and its benefits demand that developing countries first put in place a conducive environment necessary to ensure higher returns and larger markets for foreign investors. To get a share of global capital, technology and output, developing countries have to upgrade their social and economic institutions through administrative, legislative and legal reforms.

Globalisation should not be thought of as a solution to everything. It merely provides opportunities. Those who take advantage, they flourish and those who do not they sink. Globalisation is not supposed to produce equality of outcome but it produces equality of opportunity for those with right mindset. Hence the developing countries have to focus on economic restructuring building market supporting institutions and creating efficient regulatory mechanisms.

Left to themselves the low income countries cannot travel long. What in fact needed is the international assistance and a support mechanism so as to facilitate their participation in the process of globalisation. The challenge of the hour is to make globalisation work towards global prosperity through disaggregate development. The critically necessity in this context are the collective and cooperative actions which should be realized by all countries of the world and particularly the developed ones.







The Story of the Menominee River Sugar Company 1903-1955


Menominee, Michigan, situated far from the world's financial centers a hundred years ago, much as it is today, nevertheless placed itself directly in the middle of one of the hottest business booms of the early twentieth century - sugar. The small community that dared to plant a footprint in world commerce occupies a slivered point of land that dips into Lake Michigan at a point so close in proximity to Wisconsin that had a cartographer's finger twitched at a crucial moment, Menominee would be in Wisconsin instead of Michigan.

Menominee is bordered on the east by Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan, and on the south-west by the Menominee River. In 1903, many investors in the beet sugar industry had a timber background and had thus come to believe that the same rivers that had once delivered logs to sawmills in abundance could also serve the needs of a beet sugar factory where massive volumes of water are used for fluming beets into the factory, washing them and then diffusing the sugar from them. A sugar factory could easily put three million gallons of water to use every twenty-four hours. Barges can carry sugarbeets from the farm fields and freighters can carry products to market. The presence of the Menominee River convinced investors that Menominee could compete with the nation's sugar producers despite negative comments from naysayers who said Menominee was too far north to successfully grow sugarbeets.

The naysayers had a point. Menominee, Michigan is an unlikely place to construct a beet sugar factory. Situated at the western end of Michigan's Upper Peninsula, the growing season is about forty days shorter than the prime beet growing regions in the state's Lower Peninsula. The short season can prevent the ripening of beets which will then lessen sugar content of immature beets ill prepared for the stress of the milling process. Severe frosts in early spring are not unusual and are almost always fatal to a crop of young beets. Frosts can come early in the fall, too, which can make it impossible to harvest a crop. A farmer stood to lose his entire crop either early in the growing season or near the time of harvest after he had invested heavily in bringing the sugarbeet crop to term. Investors, however, in Menominee, as in many of Michigan's cities, tended to discount input from farmers before building a factory and would frequently interpret exaggerated enthusiasm from a handful of growers as representing the broader farming community. Quite often, as in Menominee's case, as it would turn out, the handful did not represent the whole.

Official recognition by the United States Department of Agriculture in 1898 of the importance of the sugarbeet industry sparked the construction of beet sugar factories across the nation. One year earlier the nation could boast only ten beet sugar factories, four of which were in California, one in Utah, two in Nebraska and three in New York. The construction of seven sugarbeet factories in 1898 brought into focus for the first time the stirrings of a rush not unlike the dot-com boom that blossomed nearly one hundred years later. The idea that sugar produced from sugarbeets could compete with sugar produced from sugarcane expanded into a full-fledged boom by 1900 when the nationwide count of sugarbeet factories stood at thirty-two in eleven states.

Nowhere was the blaze hotter than in Michigan where nine factories followed the successful start up of a factory in Essexville, Michigan, a suburb of Bay City. A burst of cyclonic enthusiasm caused a mad scramble when investors, constructors, bankers, and farmers combined energies and skills to bring to life eight factories in a single year! They were in Holland, Kalamazoo, Rochester, Benton Harbor, Alma, West Bay City, Caro, and a second factory in Essexville. Despite the paucity of factory constructors and the engineers to operate them, fourteen additional factories rose on the outskirts of Michigan towns during the next six years, one of which appeared in Menominee in 1903.

In Menominee, a group of investors undeterred by the natural disadvantages and buoyed by encouragement from influential investors and knowledgeable experts, set a plan in motion to maintain the economic viability of their city after the approaching demise of the lumber industry, which had until then provided the underpinnings of Menominee's economy. The plan included the design of one of the largest and most modern sugarbeet factories to appear in America up to that time.

As the lumber era petered out at the beginning of the 20th century, railroads that had come into their own because of timber, sought new sources of revenue. Principal among them was the Detroit and Mackinac Railroad whose land agent, Charles M. Garrison, collected and distributed information about the potential of the sugarbeet industry. While Garrison spread word among Detroit's financiers about prospective profits in sugarbeets, communities affected by the decline of lumber looked to area resources for ways of replenishing wealth. They had plenty to work with. The state was crisscrossed with rail lines and rivers and some left over cash from the lumber era. With Garrison leading the way, investors perked up. Communities eager to find a quick replacement for lumber hastened to attend meetings sponsored by Garrison and quicker yet to bring their towns into the fold. All that was needed was to persuade the farmers to grow the beets. That is where the Michigan Agricultural College (Now Michigan State University) stepped in.

Upper Peninsula farmers, encouraged by Michigan Agricultural College to plant sugarbeet test plots, received an even greater shot in the arm by the visit of Secretary of Agriculture James Wilson, in 1902. He expounded the advantages of sugarbeets and discouraged the notion that the Upper Peninsula's climate wasn't up to the task of producing profitable crops. Wilson served in three presidential cabinets, McKinley, Roosevelt, and Taft, serving longer (1897-1913) than any other cabinet official. He encouraged modern agriculture methods, including transportation and education as they applied to agriculture. His word carried a lot of weight. When he spoke of sugarbeets, some farmers listened and when his department avowed that the cold northern temperatures would not inhibit the development of the industry in their neighborhood, investors, farmers, and manufacturers lined up to begin the industry in Menominee.

Optimism rose to new heights when the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced favorable results of the sugarbeet plot tests. The Sugar Beet News of December 15, 1903, reported test results from beets delivered by approximately 140 farmers. The test runs revealed 15.6 to 19.9 % sugar, which meant a cash value to the farmers per acre of from $5.70 to $7.13 per ton ($135-$169 inflation adjusted to the current period). At those projected prices, no crop in human history had held the potential for creating such a high return from so few acres.

In the Lower Peninsula, a farmer with above average ability who placed fifteen acres in sugarbeets could earn more than $800 and if his family provided the bulk of the labor, the net profit would more than take care of a family's needs for a year, which, including food, was less than $800. After adding revenue from crops in rotation and revenues from milk, eggs, and poultry, the farm family's standard of living advanced from a subsistence level to one that compared favorably to those who held mid-management positions in industry. USDA figures supported belief that Upper Peninsula beets would exceed by two per cent the average for all the other 18 sugar beet factories in the Lower Peninsula.

If the tests proved reliable indicators, Menominee region beets were worth up to $10 more an acre than Lower Peninsula beets, assuring an income of nearly $1,000 per year just from sugarbeets.

Although enthusiasm was on the upturn, something more was needed to seal the deal. To instill confidence in prospective investors that technical expertise lay near at hand, Benjamin Boutell, who won fame as both a tugboat captain and as a captain of industry, arrived in Menominee from his Bay City, Michigan headquarters for the single purpose of conveying interested investors to Bay County where they could see groomed beet fields and efficient factories spinning out white crystalline sugar. Eleven prospective investors accompanied Boutell to Bay City where convincing evidence lay at hand. Four beet sugar factories, more than in any other city in the United States, had been constructed in that city's environs. Bay City virtually hummed with economic activity because of the presence of sugar factories. Mansions peopled by former lumber barons who had transformed themselves into sugar barons, lined the city's prestigious Center Avenue.

Boutell announced he would become one of the investors, providing the other investors had no objection to having a factory designed and installed by Joseph Kilby who was according to Boutell, the finest constructor of beet sugar factories in the United States. Many others agreed with Boutell's assessment; Kilby built nine of the eventual twenty-four factories built in Michigan. Local investors lined up behind Boutell to organize the Menominee River Sugar Company. A half dozen important backers came forward, each of whom subscribed to more than $25,000 in stock of the Menominee River Sugar Company.

Heading up the list of local shareholders was Samuel M. Stephenson, a former lumber manufacturer and native of New Brunswick, Canada who had made a home for himself, his wife, Jennie and their four daughters and one son, in Menominee. He was then seventy-one years of age but in no mood for retirement. Following a successful career in lumber and banking, he served three successive terms in Congress (Michigan's 11th District 1889-93 and the 12th District 1893-97). He invested $100,000 ($2 million by modern standards) in the beet sugar factory, taking heart in not only favorable test plot results and the enthusiasm of his neighbors but also interest shown by the American Sugar Refining Corporation, generally known by its then popular sobriquet, the Sugar Trust. Some years later the Sugar Trust would fall into disfavor as a result of charges of unfair business practices, but in 1903, it had the confidence of the general public and investors alike and controlled the manufacture and sale of 98% of sugar consumed in the United States. Trust Executives, Arthur Donner and Charles R. Heike, invested $300,000 to acquire 36% of Menominee River Sugar Company's stock.

All the members of the board of directors and roster of officers apart from Bay City resident, Benjamin Boutell, listed Menominee as their home of record. Menominee residents made up 74% of the shareholders. Together, they controlled 53% of the shares. In addition to Stephenson, other major shareholders who also accepted positions as either officers or directors were: William O. Carpenter who invested $55,000 and served the sugar company variously as president and vice-president. Gustave A. Blesch invested $15,000 and served as treasurer. John Henes, a brewery owner, invested $25,000 and served as a director. Augustus Spies was the second largest investor after Stephenson and the Sugar Trust. He, too, served as a director.

Spies provide an excellent example of the hardy pioneering spirit that prevailed in Menominee. He was a native of the grand duchy of Hessen-Darmstadt, Germany where fertile soils and a mild climate allowed the production of grain and wine. He participated in the founding of the Stephenson National Bank in partnership with future U.S. Congressman Samuel M. Stephenson and Samuel's brother, future U.S. Senator, Isaac Stephenson. In addition, he owned the Spies Lumber Company and several large tracts of forest; he was an investor in the First National Bank of Menominee, the Marinette and Menominee Paper Company and president of the Menominee Light, Railroad and Power Company. When the fledgling sugar company got under way, he stepped forward with $75,000 ($1.5 million in current dollars).

Support from Menominee's wealthy class, who also shared distinctions of making good business decisions and rising on their own merit rather than inherited wealth, was so great that there was no need to solicit funds from the public at large. With its shares over-subscribed by $35,000, the Menominee River Sugar Company was in the enviable position of having adequate capital for its venture. Not only was it possessed of sufficient capital but also it enjoyed the added benefit of the experience of Benjamin Boutell and representatives of the Sugar Trust. Menominee would not want for technical or business expertise.

Gustave Blesch, like Augustus Spies, owed his success to the inherited qualities of hard work, honesty and the respect of his peers. He would become the sugar company's first treasurer. He was born in Green Bay, Wisconsin in 1859, the son of Francis Blesch, a native of Germany and Antoinette Schneider, a native of Belgium. Gustave became an office boy in the Kellogg National Bank of Green Bay, rising to teller by the age of twenty. Five years later, he moved to Menominee to help establish the First National Bank of Menominee where he began as cashier before becoming the bank's president. He became president of the Menominee Brick Company, vice-president of the Menominee-Marinette Light & Traction Company, and treasurer of the Peninsula Land Company.

In January, 1903, the newly elected board of directors approved an $800,000 (nearly $19 million in current era dollars) construction contract for a Kilby designed and built factory that would slice 1,000 tons of beets per day. Of the 48 beet sugar factories in operation in the United States in 1903, only two were larger than Menominee's new factory, one in Salinas, California and another in Fort Collins, Colorado.

The average sugar factory in Michigan in 1903 could slice six hundred tons of beets in a twenty-four hour period. Four thousand acres of beets would easily supply a season's factory run. Had the investors surveyed the farmers first, surely they would have been advised to build a smaller factory, and perhaps would have been persuaded to build none. Farmers delivered beets from approximately 1,500 acres, well short of the 9,000 acres the investment demanded.

The Menominee factory's first factory run (referred to as a "campaign" in the sugar industry) ended quickly, having received only 14,263 tons, enough for a production run of fourteen days for a factory the investors planned to operate at least one hundred days. However, the farmers had submitted beets containing the highest sugar reported of any company during its first campaign, 15.04 percent - about 20 percent more than average and enough to allow for a small profit from a meager beet supply. Like nearly all the factories, records that would inform us of profit, if any, earned during that first campaign, did not survive the passage of time. However, it would be reasonable to estimate, based on the known cost of supplies of coal, coke, limestone and the cost of labor, that a profit of $36,000 was achievable, especially under a management style that paid close attention to expenditures and especially in light of the very high percentage of sugar in the beets.

The second campaign was better with enough beets for a full month, still well short of a supply needed to generate profits enough to justify the investment. By 1911, the local supply reached a level that allowed steady profits but was insufficient to encourage expansion, a condition that persisted until 1926 when grower apathy fell to a level that required closing the factory until 1933 when it reopened for a final run of twenty years during which the factory lagged behind the industry in technology and growth. Year in and year out, because of an inadequate supply of beets, mostly grown in Wisconsin, the underutilized factory ended its campaign weeks earlier than was needed to produce healthy profits which then could have been reinvested in the factory. Menominee investors learned, as did many other sugar factory investors, that the mantra, "build it and they will come" fell on deaf ears among farmers who often displayed a better understanding of sugar economics than did investors.

The passage of time brought neither harm nor good to the Menominee factory as it was unable to expand or modernize. It settled into the process of graceful aging. Profits awaiting opportunity gradually accumulated thanks to the company's penurious management style and a dedicated cadre of farmers.

George W. McCormick, the company's first manager, inaugurated a careful management style that went a long way toward keeping the company profitable despite annual shortfalls in the beet supply. He managed the company during its first thirty-two years of operation, beginning when he was twenty-four years of age. He met Benjamin Boutell in Bay City when he moved there to take a job as a district manager for Travelers Insurance Company. Boutell thought the young man belonged in the rapidly developing sugar industry and encouraged him to help in the establishment of a sugar factory in Wallaceburg, Ontario. After completing the assignment with success, Boutell recommended him for the manager's job in Menominee.

Menominee was the most difficult place in the United States to process sugarbeets. The low temperatures took a heavy toll on workers, machinery and beets that usually went through the slicing machines like boulders, damaging equipment that robbed the factory of slender resources. It was difficult to find replacement parts because of the distance separating Menominee from suppliers and from Lower Peninsula sugar factories where it was common for factory managers to lend spare parts to one another.

The company's diligent attention to cost control paid off in 1924 when sugar factories located in Green Bay and Menominee Falls, Wisconsin went on the market. Menominee River Sugar Company purchased both and then invested significant sums in restoring the Menominee Falls factory that had been shut for three years immediately preceding its sale.

The renovated Menominee Falls factory combined with the Green Bay and Menominee, Michigan factories created more capacity than was needed for the available acreage. One of the factories would have to close. Menominee won the noose after the accountants counted up the freight costs for hauling beets to each factory. The Menominee factory remained closed until 1933 when Michigan's farmers relented and agreed to return to sugarbeets, a decision that came too late to save the hides of the sugar company's owners who had lost the company to defaulted bonds three years earlier.

Disruptions in Europe beginning in the early part of the 1930s brought a new name to Michigan's beet sugar fields and corporate offices - Flegenheimer. Albert Flegenheimer was the son of Samuel Flegenheimer who had immigrated to the United States in either 1864 or 1866 and became a naturalized citizen in 1873. The next year, however, he returned to Germany, settling in Wurttemberg. He lived out his life there, dying in 1929 at the age of 81. His brief sojourn in the United States and his U.S. citizenship status, however, would one day save his descendants from German death camps.

In February 1939, Albert Flegenheimer carried his family to the safety of Canada and then to the U.S. claiming nationality as the son of a naturalized citizen. He planned to raise his family and devote his time to the sugar industry in both the United States and Canada. His plans met with considerable success and by 1954, he controlled the sugar factory in Menominee and the one in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Despite Albert Flegenheimer's efforts, a lack of interest on the part of farmers kept the factory small and outdated. It struggled year by year until finally in 1955 with its equipment exhausted, its buildings in tattered repair and its farmers pursuing other crops, Menominee River Sugar Company, built on hopes and dreams and operated with fortitude and persistence for more than a half-century, closed its doors forever.

Sources:

GUTLEBEN, Dan, The Sugar Tramp-1954- Michigan, Printed by: Bay City Duplicating Co, San Francisco, 1954

1962 TWIN CITY COMMUNITY RESOURCES WORKSHOP, section entitled Famous Leaders Who Helped Build Menominee, prepared by Irene Swain, Dr. Leo J. Alilunas, Director.

HENLEY, ROBERT L., Sweet Success . . .The Story of Michigan's Beet Sugar Industry 1898 - 1974, Michigan Historical Center, Department of History, Arts and Libraries

INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS: The pre-1975 data are the Consumer Price Index statistics from Historical Statistics of the United States (USGPO, 1975). All data since then are from the annual Statistical Abstracts of the United States. Recorded at http://www.westegg.com/inflation

MICHIGAN ANNUAL REPORTS, Michigan Archives, Lansing, Michigan
©2009 Thomas Mahar

About the Author:
Thomas Mahar served as Executive Vice President of Monitor Sugar Company between 1984 and 1999 and as President of Gala Food Processing, a sugar packaging company, from 1993-1998. He retired in 1999 and now devotes his free time to writing about the history of the sugar industry. He authored, Sweet Energy, The Story of Monitor Sugar Company in 2001.




This blog provides a history for each of the 24 beet sugar factories constructed in Michigan beginning in 1898 and ending in 1920.




Niche Publishing Goldmines


I started a new publishing business some years ago with a Mac Plus, a Laser Writer and two used desks. Just four years laser my company was grossing nearly $800,000 a year.

I was publishing NCEast, a regional magazine; the North Carolina Travel and Tourism Guide, Welcome to Wilmington, a slick four-color newcomer'sguide to this major metropolitan area; Homebuyer's Handbook, a real estate buyer's guide; Washington and Beaufort County Magazine, a city magazine; and Renter's Helper apartment

directories in nine mid-Atlantic cities. Earlier I had published the Mecklenburg Gazette, a weekly newspaper, and Dollarsworth, a free circulation shopper.

Brains and Time, Not Cash

None of my start-'ups cost me one single cent in out-of-pocket cash. Getting into borne town publishing, I found, takes its toll in brain power, time, and energy, but requires little cash investment. Others may find this claim hard to believe, but it's true. I have always been able to finance my books, magazines and newspapers with sweat equity and the cash flow generated by the projects themselves.

Who Can Succeed?

I am convinced that I could take my computer, a toothbrush and a change of clothes to any town or city in the United States and generate a substantial income for myself in entrepreneurial publishing. What I can do, you can do too. I know successful entrepreneurial publishers who have backgrounds in sales; others come from the ranks of graphic designers; some are free-lance writers who are tired of sending articles to other people's magazines and have created publications of their own. Some are simply, management types with an idea they believe in, and the willingness to give it sty.

What Will Work: The Two-Way Test

Successful publications match large numbers of product-purchasing readers with similarly large numbers of ambitious, space-buying advertisers. To insure that this happens, and happens quickly, the start-up publishing entrepreneur should look for projects that have the possibility of intensive sales in a limited geographical area. Expanding the coverage area beyond the easy reach of on or two people can create real difficulties - and much greater expense.

A city magazine, for example, is relatively easy to publish; a regional magazine (the mountains of your state, for instance, or the coast) is more difficult and more expensive; a statewide magazine requires an entire staff of sales and production people. A-national magazine requires all of the above, plus a high-risk investor with several million dollars of idle money in very deep pockets.

When you focus rightly, several good things happen: You can start your business with little or no cash up front. You or your ad salesperson can make calls and sell the product without traveling anywhere overnight. Circulation, distribution and promotion are easily and inexpensively managed. You can do these jobs yourself if necessary.

What kinds of publications fall into these categories? There are many, but here are some that I have personally published:

Local Tourism Guides

Tourism guides range from tabloid newspapers to full-sized, extra-slick color magazines. The most popular format is the digest-sized (5.5" x 8.5"), saddle-stitchçd, four color publication printed on economy, enameled stock. I have however, seen long-lived, successful tourism guides printed in black and white, with a little spot color thrown in.

The tourism guide has very short, pithy articles on things to do and places to go. Iris filled with little maps to help readers find their When 1 say "entrepreneurial publishing" I am not talking about way around. It lists restaurants and their specialties, nightclubs traditional trade hook publishing, in which you sell a product (your and every other possible kind of vacation or travel activity, book) through distributors and bookstores. That is a high-risk, including everything from the miniature golf course built to capital-intensive business, fraught with peril for the small guy. To create a cash flow that can float your business, pay your rent and buy new

shoes for the kids requires at least ten successful tides in print. And even when your books sell, the returns come in slowly and unpredictably. No, I am talking about advertising-intensive periodical publishing, which can often be undertaken with no capital at all. In periodical publishing, the advertising that you sell pays the way.

The publications themselves are often distributed free, or in some combination of paid and free. When there is a price printed on the front of your tabloid or magazine it is usually done as a marketing ploy, designed to lend perceived value. You do not depend on subscriptions or newsstand sales to snake a profit, of advertising space. Given away free in motel rooms, welcome centers, convenience stores, newsstands and every other conceivable place, these guides are always consulted by ever-renewable numbers of vacationers. Advertisers will be eager to buy space in any well-designed and widely-circulated guide to reach this constant stream of visitors.

Newcomers Guides

We are a mobile nation. The average family in the United States pulls up stakes and moves to new cities, towns and neighborhoods every five years. This means that 20 percent of all families in America are on the road at any given time.

We are also a nation of consumers. We need things. We need people who can do things for us. And when we move we need them all at once. Last week, securely nestled in our old home, we knew which doctor to go to. When we had a toothache, we knew which dentist to call. We knew where to go to buy a new car and where to get the insurance for it. We knew where to shop for clothes, go to the movies, eat a good meal, buy a book. We knew how to register the children for school, where to get the electricity turned on and how to subscribe to cable TV.

Yes, last week we knew all of these things. But this week we don't know any of them. We are in a new home, in a new neighborhood, in a new city - maybe even in a new state. We need to find these things out all over again. And this is precisely what a newcomer guide helps readers do.

While the tourism guide focuses only on entertainment/leisure advertisers, in the newcomer magazine everyone from plumbers to electricians to interior designers and new car dealers are prime targets. For this reason newcomer's guides are a staple of the independent publisher. Every metropolitan area of more than 30,000 is prime territory for such a publication, and they can be quite successful on a smaller level in much smaller towns. I published one successfully in a town of 14,000.

City Magazines

City (or county) magazines are attractive projects for the independent publisher. These are four-color, 8 1/2" x 11", self-covered glossy magazines. They focus on the culture, history, personalities and business of a single community.

Since the advertising rates will be relatively high, the city magazine needs a fairly large metropolitan area to support monthly or bi-monthly publication. But an annual city magazine can be successful in small towns.

There are fringe benefits that some entrepreneurial publishers will enjoy. As editor and publisher of a "real" magazine (as distinguished from the promotional Chamber of Commerce variety) you will be courted and admired by writers and artists, and be invited to be the featured speaker at many a civic club dinner. You will have a showcase for your own writing, and even begin, over time, to wield a bit of influence in molding and mobilizing opinion in your community through the articles that you publish.

City magazines are most successful when they are part of a mix of publications brought out by the same publisher. They are not likely to produce a large enough cash flow to float your business as a single activity. At least that has been my experience.

Chamber of Commerce "Quality of Life" Magazines

If you are planning a move to a new city and you write the Chamber of Commerce for an information packet, you will receive maps, pamphlets and other materials. Among these will be a publication that looks like a magazine, with a strong mix of editorial and advertising. These are the so-called "quality of life" magazines that virtually every Chamber of Commerce in the country publishes annually. It is not a real magazine like the ones you buy on a newsstand, but rather a strong promotional piece dressed up to look like a magazine.

Since each issue is good for as many as two or three years, there is no regular publication date, and so producing such a product doesn't constitute an onerous commitment. If you do a fantastic job you'll be asked back. You can decide at that time whether you want to do the magazine again or not. Usually the money is good, the time commitment reasonably small, and the public recognition for you and your new company both gratifying and valuable - a combination of benefits that is hard to resist.

Again, you have three pluses going for you: intensive sales, in a limited geographical area, with targeted circulation. I won't say that ad sales are ever easy, but with the quality of life magazine they are as easy as they're going to get. The businesses that are Chamber members have been conditioned to "participate," issue after issue, year after year. There may be a grumble or two, but most of those who bought last year will buy again this year.

Association Directories

My introduction to publishing association directories came when a friend suggested that I design and print a directory for the newly-formed North Carolina World Trade Association. The directory would carry the names and addresses of the hundreds of members of the organization, plus advertising from many of them. I would produce the directories free of charge for the association, and give them a check for 10% of gross advertising revenues.

I was immediately interested, for three reasons:

1. The project could easily be handled by the people I had in place - by me alone, if necessary.

2. I did not carry the financial baggage of excessive overhead the other, larger, periodical publishers would have to factor into their profit and loss analysis. I could be very competitiveat no loss in quality or profit.

3. The ads could be sold by telephone, for the most part, to members of the association. There would be no need for any resemble the Aztec Empire, to true golf courses, parks, flea markets, but on the sale specialty shops and other entertainment possibilities too varied to catalog here. There would be no need for any hard sell, and there would be triple motivation for these members to buy:


First of all, they could afford it. Most of the advertising prospects - major banks, shipping lines, large industries had budgets more than adequate to handle the cost of advertising. Since it was an annual publication, their cost would occur only once each year. Availability of funds would be no problem.
Furthermore, they would be likely to buy ads, at least in the first issue or two, purely out of loyalty to the organization.
Finally, the directory would offer a strong, targeted advertising opportunity. There was no other place where these advertisers could so easily reach their most sought-after potential customers: those involved in the import-export trade and international distribution of manufactured goods.

Check your yellow pages for association names and addresses. Perhaps there is a directory out there for you.

Weekly Newspapers and Specialty Tabloids

Weekly newspapers and specialty tabloids are very attractive entrepreneurial projects, and well within the reach of the two-person publishing company. Such publications-have a lot going for them and are easier to get going than you might think. These publications also meet our criteria for success: they have a clearly defined and limited trade area and target a finite list of advertising prospects, all of whom are easily reached. Moreover, tabloids are inexpensive to design and produce.

There may be some modest start-up costs, mainly for office space and initial supplies. (You can avoid the space cost have a large enough basement or double garage that could be converted into an office.) Most equipment, chiefly your computer, laser printer and fax, can be leased. Production tables, files and other paraphernalia are generally very simple to design and can be homemade.

These virtually negligible up-front costs are more than balanced by the short weekly billing cycle you will be working on. By the time your next month's lease payments come due you will already have four or five (yes, some months will have five Wednesdays in them!) weeks' accounts receivable to pay them. If, in the beginning, you do not need to draw out great amounts of cash for your own living expenses, it really is quite possible to start a newspaper and pay for it out of current revenues.

This is precisely what I did with the Mecklenburg Gazette, a weekly newspaper that I owned in Davidson, North Carolina. When I got hold of it, the newspaper was literally a week away from bankruptcy. I had no cash to speak of-just a few thousand dollars in savings to live on until advertising revenues started coming in.

Among the population segments that could form the base of a profitable publication are people with shared interests, ethnic and religious groups and, for university towns, guides for incoming students.

Apartment Comparison and Real Estate Guides

You go into a motel in a new town. In one corner of the lobby are wire racks stuffed full of pamphlets and booklets offering apartments for rent and homes for sale to every eventual newcomer who might be passing that way. These modest publications are chock-full of ads, each of which may cost anywhere from several' hundred dollars to a thousand or more dollars per page. Some of these publications may be tabloid style, but most will be brilliant, full-color booklets and magazines printed on slick paper. All of them are free.

Where there is a great deal of money being spent advertising in a niche market publication, there is also a great deal of it to be made. It was not unusual for one 126-page issue of my apartment directory to contain over $100,000 in advertising.

How Much Can You Make?

Independent, home-based publishing is a business in which you can earn almost as much money as you desire to earn, so long as you are willing to work for it and learn the business. Some people have a laid-back style, want to live simply and modestly, and find the publishing life a delightful way to do it. Others will put in the effort and brain power to earn sixty or seventy thousand dollars a year. And some ambitious souls shoot for the biggest prize of all-they want to develop strong publications, duplicate them in every imaginable market, franchise them, go public and become millionaires.

Each of these scenarios is a possible one. The one you choose will depend on your temperament, and your mastery of the success principles and trade secrets of the business

Can I guarantee your success? No, I cannot. I do not know the intensity of your ambition, your capacity for work, or your skill in managing the work of others (always a key element). What I can guarantee is that the ideas presented in this article have worked for me; they have worked for others; and they can work for you, to the degree that you study them carefully and put them into practice with energy and intelligence.




Dr. Thomas A. Williams is the author of 14 books, including Publish Your Own Magazine, Guidebook, or Weekly Newspaper, a complete start-up guide and operations manual for entrepreneurial publishers. He is also the originator of many magazines, guidebooks, newspapers and tabloids, and operates his publishing company, from his home in Savannah, GA. Williams can be reached by email at bookpub@comcast.net and at http://www.pubmart.com




On January 31, 2006 President George W Bush Delivered His State of the Union Address


In the speech he brought out many points he felt were of interest and utmost importance to the American people. Some of the main points that were mentioned had to do with the economy, war on terror, immigration, energy, social security, healthcare, education as well as other topics. In addition the President outlined succinctly his vision to insure the continued growth and safety of the United States.

The following are some of the highlights of what the President's plans are:

Economy - As President Bush said "Our economy is healthy and vigorous, and growing faster than other major industrialized nations."[1] Although many Americans believe that the economy is on a downward spiral, the facts just do not bear this out. While it is true that prices for oil and gasoline are at record highs, every leading economic indicator continues to show a uniquely robust sound and growing economy. Early in 2002 for example the unemployment rate was nearly 5.8%. This rate has continued to go down. The strong economy is validated by an unemployment rate of February 2006 at 4.8%.[2] Another leading economic indicator would be the stock market. For example, in October 2002 the Down Jones Industrial Average had plummeted all the way down to 7289.27 as it was still buried in the aftermath of the tragic events of 9/11/01, which had catastrophic effects on our nation's economy.[3] By 2006 the DJIA, again, despite soaring record high oil prices, reached a 4 year high level of 11,229.47.[4] This growth which shows an approximate 50% increase in the Dow Jones Average is a clear indicator of just how well our economy has recovered in such a relatively short period of time.

Immigration - President Bush said "Our nation needs orderly and secure borders..." and "We hear claims that immigrants are somehow bad for the economy -- even though this economy could not function without them. 1 Despite what most conservatives believe President Bush plans on calling for a guest-worker program that provides for automatic citizenship for illegal immigrants now living and working in the United States. As Daniel Henninger mentions in his article in the Wall Street Journal that President Bush affirms that he believes in respect for the law, as he mentioned it in a radio address: "America is a nation of immigrants, and we're also a nation of laws". The President's plan is to keep our borders strong. While believing this, however he also understands that our nation's economy has always been built up by the hard work, blood, sweat, and tears of immigrants.

Education - Also, President Bush said "Our greatest advantage in the world has always been our educated, hard-working, ambitious people - and we're going to keep that edge." Recognizing that the nations future lies in its advances in the technologies, the President called for more and precise Math and Science courses, and to help the struggling students so that they can further better themselves and we can continue to compete with other countries.1 I think this is an excellent plan because we should always strive to keep the United States of America number one in any category.

While the president spoke on many topics, there are the three issues I am mostly interested which are: Homeland Security/ War on Terror, Social Security and our national policy on energy. In my opinion these issues are important amongst other things, because we are at war; I need to worry about my social security as we are a nation growing older; and lastly we need to create new means of energy and to become less reliant on imports.

The events of September 11, 2001 highlighted the importance of home land security across the nation. It was clearly our nations pompous belief that we could not be attacked at home that led to a lax security system in the United States. Therefore, and because of the tragedy of 9/11, the United States Department of Homeland Security was created. The Department of Homeland Security (hereinafter DHS) was established November 25, 2002 but legitimately began on January 24, 2003. The plan was to merge any organization associated to "homeland security" into a single cabinet thereby making us more responsive and able to act quickly. The Department is currently headed by federal judge Michael Chertoff. [5] The reorganization plan of the DHS in November 25, 2002 consists of some of the following responsibilities and plans:

1) Transferring other existing agencies into the department such as the Department of Health and Human Services, the Coast Guard, the United States Secret Service etc.;

2) Establish the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency and Acceleration Fund for Research and Development of Homeland Security Technologies;

3) Establish Bureau of Border Security;

4) Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection - identify and scope out terrorist threats; consult with the CIA and other federal agencies, state and local governments to ensure proper exchanges of information;

5) Coordinate training in information analysis;

6) Develop emergency preparedness systems;

7) Science and Technology - develop a national policy and strategic plan for identifying chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and any other terrorists threats;

8) Detecting, preventing and protecting against terrorist attacks etc. [6]

I believe that creating the DHS on President Bush's part was a great idea because homeland security is a priority for him and the Department is in fact doing their job.

Some of the accomplishments of the Department are:

Cracking down on terrorists financing with our international partners;

Improving border screening and security through the US-Visit Entry-Exit System;

Transforming the FBI to focus on preventing terrorism;

Increasing cooperation and reform among the international partners at the front lines of the war on terror;

Strengthening transportation security etc.

DHS also worked on establishing the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), and the Terrorist Screening Center, and National Targeting Center (NTC) etc.

In part due to all of these accomplishments and actions, not only has the United States not been attacked since 9/11, but we have taken the offensive while putting terrorists on the run.

Flying has never been any safer and the US-Visit Entry - Exist system exists in 115 airports, 14 seaports and 50 land border crossings. The NTC examines about 9 million high risk shipping containers per year. 1

President Bush says it best ..."We're living in historic times when you think about this world we're in. It is a time of challenge, and it's a time of opportunity. We've got the challenge to protect the American people. My most important duty is to protect you from harm. And we have an opportunity to lay the foundation of peace for generation to come. "

-President George W. Bush-

We must never forget the day of September 11, 2001, when all of those innocent people died because of the actions of radical terrorists. We must stop all actions of terror even if they may not on our lands. The more democracies we create, the more allies we have and the safer we are.

I know that there is this concern of our freedom and civil liberties slowly being taken away. For example, Wire Tapping is a huge issue in the news, but if you have nothing to hide, then what's wrong with trying to protect us?

The next topic I would like to mention is another important issue addressed in the State of the Union, Social Security. The Social Security Act was developed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1935 during the Great Depression as part of his New Deal. It was originally created to help retirees and the unemployed by insuring an income for people as they got older or became unemployed. FICA was created in 1937 and all the employed were required to pay payroll taxes (contribute to the fund) in order to help fund the national retirement vehicle which we know as Social Security. Social Security was one of the greatest successes. [7]

Social Security faces future problems under the system today. If we do not reform Social Security there will be a high percentage in benefit cuts. The system is funded by payroll taxes and as our nations grows older and life expectancy continues to get longer fewer people will in fact be contributing to the system for more recipients. This is a tremendous problem because the government will have to come up billions of dollars in someway and eventually the system will be bankrupt. 7 Yes, Social Security is in crisis and the answer is not to raise taxes. Raising taxes would just be devastating to homes because it would just be making savings more difficult.

President Bush's plans are to allow people to put a small portion of their payroll taxes into bond and stock funds and retirement accounts. The President's goals are to strengthen the safety net for future generations; protect those who depend on Social Security; and offer every American a chance to experience the opportunity of ownership through voluntary personal retirement accounts. 1 President Bush's plans gives people a chance to save and enjoy their benefits, to put money aside and plan for their future.

The last topic I would like to discuss is energy. Before the industrial revolution we relied on the sun and burned wood for heat. For transportation we relied on horses and boats. For our machines we relied on water and wind to for energy. We went from water wheels to water turbines. Then we discovered that oil which processed into gasoline can be used for automobiles. Thomas Edison and Henry Ford were the turn of the century. Today we depend on energy to survive; therefore there is an increase in demand for the fossil fuels and the cost just keep rising. [8]

In the President's State of the Union he says

"Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. And here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world. The best way to break this addiction is through technology ... By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can dramatically improve our environment, move beyond petroleum- based economy, and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past."

The president would like to reduce our dependency on foreign oil from 75% to 20%, which would be a lot cheaper for us. He would also like to see a 22% increase in clean coal technologies, wind technologies, clean safe nuclear energy, hybrid and hydrogen cars and a popular topic ethanol. Energy conversion is a serious issue today. A way to increase domestic energy production is by using renewable energy resources here in the United States. Renewable resources are constantly replenished and never run out. Some renewable energy technologies, such as water- and wind-driven mills, have been in use for centuries. The United States has the world's largest known coal reserves, about 275 billion short tons. There is enough coal to last over two hundred years at today's level of use. Coal can be used for electric power. Wind technologies produce electricity at low costs with minor harm to the environment.[9] In John M. Urbanchuk's article "Contribution of the Ethanol Industry to the Economy of the United States" he states that ethanol industries spent billions of dollars in raw materials to create ethanol and a large portion of their spending went to corn. He also lists the positive effects that ethanol will have on American economy such as: creating new jobs, reduces dependency on foreign oil, provides a growing and reliable domestic market for American farmers, etc.

President Bush has already acted on energy conversion even before his State of the Union address for example in August of 2005 President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act, which set a standard of 7.5 billion gallons of renewable resources such as ethanol to be used in the nations highway fuel supply by 2012. I see that there is a plan for energy conversion, but I do also understand that it will take many years for us to even see a noticeable result. As long as we continue with a plan and the technologies our domestic market will increase therefore will help the nation's economy to grow and help others individually.

President Bush has done an outstanding job overall, besides the normal issues that always face a President for example the economy. President Bush has appeared to put together a clear, concise vision for our nation's future. In addition he has enumerated a clear proactive approach in which to lay the ground work to accomplish his goals. However in my views he often times seems focused on only one topic terrorism. I speak for myself and probably for most I do not want to witness another day like 9/11 happen in my life time or any lifetime, we as a country should do anything to prevent that. I am proud that our President is concerned with the issue of terrorism but on the other hand I think he needs express his concerns for domestic issues a little more often. I don't know how soon the social security reform will take place, but hopefully soon because if so it will eventually no longer exist. President Bush's plans overall is to create affordable healthcare, save social security, reduce America's dependency on foreign oil with renewable resources, reform the immigration system, homeland security etc. I hope the next President will agree and continue with President Bush's plans for the future of this nation.




peter mangano

http://printertoner.ws/




Another Way Around the Credit Crisis - Minnesota Bill Authorizing Banks to "Monetize" Public Works


In August 2007, the nation was stunned by the collapse of a major Minneapolis bridge, killing nine. The bridge had been rated structurally deficient by the U.S. government as far back as 1990, and it was only one of more than 70,000 bridges across the country with that rating. The American Society of Civil Engineers estimated that it would take nearly $190 billion to fix the country's failing bridges over the next two decades. Minnesota and other states have the manpower and the materials to rebuild. What they lack is only the money to do it. Municipal governments have to borrow money by issuing bonds, and the interest they must pay on these bonds is going up.

On March 13, 2008, Erik Sirri, director of the SEC's division of trading and markets, told Congress that the credit crisis has spread to municipal bond auctions. "There is no question that the recent dislocations in the municipal bond markets have created unanticipated hardships for municipal issuers and in some cases dramatically increased their borrowing costs," Sirri said. The inability of cities and states to sell municipal bonds to investors at reasonable interest rates seriously threatens plans to build new roads, schools, airports and other public works projects.1

Although the cost of borrowing is going up for municipal governments, this is not because they are bad credit risks. In fact, they are extremely good credit risks. Creditors know where to find them, and local governments have the power to tax to pay their bills. The problem lies with the bond insurers called "monolines," which have ventured into the very risky mortgage-backed securities market. This has put the insurers' triple-A ratings in jeopardy, along with the ratings of the municipal bonds they insure.

While borrowing costs for municipal governments are skyrocketing, the interest rate the Federal Reserve charges to banks has been going down, even though banks are proving to be much riskier investments than local governments. The Federal Reserve is a private banking corporation that is owned by other banks. It was established in 1913 to prevent bank runs and otherwise keep the banks from getting into trouble for over-leveraging (lending out many times their assets), and that remains its principal function today. The Federal Reserve recently extended $200 billion in financing to 20 top investment banks at wholesale rates, but these low rates are not being passed on to municipal governments or home buyers. The Federal Reserve is evidently working for the banks more than for taxpayers or local governments.Thinking Outside the Box: The Minnesota Transportation Act

Many people are getting tired of waiting for the Federal Reserve and the federal government to act, and one of them is a Minnesota resident named Byron Dale. Dale has drafted a bill called "the Minnesota Transportation Act" (MTA), which is scheduled for hearing before the Minnesota Senate Transportation Committee on March 25, 2008. If adopted, the bill could represent a major innovation in the way state and local projects are funded. It would mandate Minnesota's Transportation Department and State-chartered banks to enter into an agreement providing that the banks would advance funds for legislatively-approved transportation projects in the same way that banks make commercial loans - simply by "monetizing" the projects themselves. Banks routinely monetize the promissory notes of borrowers just by making book entries to a checking account and saying "you have a new deposit with us." (More on this below.)

Under the MTA, the state-chartered banks would create a pass-through account titled an Asset Monetization Account (AMA), monetizing the bid value of projects. This would be done in the same way that banks monetize collateral, except that the deposit would go on the bank's books as an asset rather than a liability, turning the bid value of the project into "money" without debt. This money would be debited electronically out of the AMA and credited to the State's Transportation Account (STA), from which it would then be debited out and credited in to the contractor's bank account in a state bank, according to the terms of the contract. The contractor would spend this money to complete the project. The money would flow into Minnesota's economy, where it would provide for better, safer, more durable roads and bridges. It would be used to purchase goods and services, benefiting business. It would go to pay taxes, helping the State balance its budget. And it would flow back into the state-chartered banks as interest on outstanding loans, reducing the number of loan defaults and improving the profits of the state-chartered banks. In this way, says Dale, the MTA would benefit every segment of society.Too Radical? Maybe Not . . .

Dale says he has been proposing this sort of state funding alternative for years; but only now, with the looming liquidity crisis, have legislators begun to take him seriously. His plan may not be such a radical departure from existing practice as it sounds. Commercial banks are already in the business of creating money. Except for coins, our entire money supply is now created by banks in the form of loans.2 Indeed, banks create all the money they lend. This was confirmed by the Chicago Federal Reserve in a booklet called "Modern Money Mechanics," which states:

"Of course, [banks] do not really pay out loans from the money they receive as deposits. If they did this, no additional money would be created. What they do when they make loans is to accept promissory notes in exchange for credits to the borrowers' transaction accounts. Loans (assets) and deposits (liabilities) both rise [by the same amount]."3

Many other authorities have confirmed this money-creating mechanism of commercial banks.4 State-chartered banks get their authority to create money from the State, and the State has the authority to determine the purpose for which banks create money. State banks are now permitted to create money to monetize a mortgage or other promise to repay. They could as easily be authorized to "monetize" the promise of contractors to deliver labor and materials to the State in the form of road and bridge repair and construction.

The argument against this creative approach is that it would be inflationary, but would it? Inflation results when "demand" (money) increases faster than "supply" (goods and services); and in this case goods and services would be increasing along with the money available to spend, keeping the money supply in balance and prices stable. In fact, it is the lending of money created out of thin air that is inflationary, because banks create the principal but not the interest necessary to pay back their loans. Additional loans must therefore continually be taken out just to service the "money" (or debt) that is already in the money supply; and this newly-created money goes into the pockets of middlemen rather than contributing to the productivity of the community. "Demand" (money) thus goes up without a corresponding increase in "supply," creating price inflation.

The solution to this conundrum is to authorize banks to monetize the production of real goods and services, creating supply and demand at the same time. There is substantial precedent for this approach, stretching as far back as the early American colonies:

* In the early eighteenth century, the colony of Pennsylvania issued money that was both lent and spent by the local government into the economy, producing an unprecedented period of prosperity. This was done not only without producing price inflation but without taxing the people.

* When Abraham Lincoln needed money to fund the American Civil War, rather than paying 25 to 36 percent interest charges, he avoided going into debt by printing Greenback dollars that were "legal tender" in themselves. Again, historians of the period attest that this issue of Greenbacks was not responsible for price inflation.

* A successful infrastructure program funded with interest-free "national credit" was instituted in New Zealand after it elected its first Labor government in the 1930s. Credit issued by its nationalized central bank allowed New Zealand to thrive at a time when the rest of the world was struggling with poverty and lack of productivity.

* The island state of Guernsey, located in the British Channel Islands, has been funding infrastructure with government-issued money for over 200 years, without creating price inflation and without government debt.5 But Is It Constitutional?

These governments could create the money they needed because they were sovereign entities, but what about individual States governed by a federal Constitution? In the United States, the U.S. Constitution controls. But that august document says very little about the creation of money - so little that banks have stepped in and taken over the business by default. Here are the sole Constitutional provisions directly addressing the creation of money:



Article I, Section 8, Clause 5

: The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.

Article I, Section 10, Clause 1

: No State shall...coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.

Congress has been given the power to coin money, but minting coins is not the same thing as issuing paper money, checkbook money, accounting-entry money, or electronic money - the forms of money used most often today. Arguably, "to coin" money was an archaic way of saying "to create" money, but then what is to be made of the clause stating, "No state shall . . . make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt"? "Coin" here clearly means precious metal coins, period.

That clause is interesting for another reason: when was the last time you heard of a State paying its debts in gold or silver coin? States routinely pay their debts with the bank-created accounting-entry money that now composes over 97 percent of the U.S. money supply (M3), and that form of money is omitted from the Constitution altogether. The States therefore violate the Constitution every day, something they must do if they are to pay their debts at all, since gold and silver coins are no longer in general circulation. The Constitution obviously needs to be amended to suit the times. Meanwhile, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution (part of the Bill of Rights) provides:



X - Rights of the States under Constitution

: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Creating checkbook money is not specifically delegated to the United States, so it must be delegated to the States, unless it is specifically prohibited to them. What about the provision that "No State shall . . . emit Bills of Credit"? According to "the 'Lectric Law Library," "bills of credit are declared to mean promissory notes . . . . Bills of credit may be defined to be paper issued and intended to circulate through the community for its ordinary purposes as money redeemable at a future day." Bills of credit are promises to pay later rather than what is being discussed here: checkbook money issued as "legal tender" - the sort of dollars banks issue every day when they make commercial loans. The Constitution does not say who is authorized to issue this sort of money - whether in paper, electronic or accounting-entry form - so under the Tenth Amendment, this right is reserved to the States and to the People.

As the credit crisis deepens and exposes the inability of the existing banking structure to meet the public's needs, creative funding plans similar to the proposed MTA could be popping up in communities around the country. If the U.S. Congress and the privately-owned Federal Reserve will not issue the funds necessary for bridge and road repair and other urgent public projects, we can encourage our State legislators to fill the breach; and if they won't do it, we the people can get together, apply for a bank charter, and create the funding ourselves. (See E. Brown, "How to Start Your Own Bank," webofdebt.wordpress.com, February 23, 2008.)




Ellen Brown, J.D., developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In "Web of Debt," her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal Reserve and "the money trust." She shows how this private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. The website is http://www.webofdebt.com/

Her eleven books include the bestselling "Nature's Pharmacy," co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker, which has sold 285,000 copies.