Search Insurance

Showing posts with label Attorneys. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Attorneys. Show all posts

Monday, August 27, 2012

Franchise Disclosure Laws Give Upper Hand to Attorneys


In today's franchising industry franchisors are forced to have excessive disclosure documents. Franchise Attorneys will collect this data to try to sue you. Every one knows you should never trust an Attorney; that also goes for any Franchise Attorney also. If you are in franchising you will of course need a few of these extorsionists to protect you from other suing franchise lawyers. Franchising Lawyers; 88% are incompetent, so be careful and do you home work. Many hardly know their rear ends from a hole in the ground. Be sure to read the study on the Franchise Attorney, Franchising Lawyer and problems in franchising law.

We need a complete overhaul in the industry with regards to franchise attorneys. While participating on the ABA Forum on Franchising for about 4 years, I have been noticing a problem with the aptitude and experience level of those who purport to practicing in the area of franchise law. Several quote "Franchising Attorneys" often ask questions of other attorneys of the group which are things they should inherently know if they claim to be "Franchising Attorneys". The ABA Forum on franchising, godbless their souls, claims that lawyers from all different experience levels come to the board and ask questions.

Well a recent question was asked by a practicing attorney in CA who claims to be a Business and Franchising Attorney on his web site, business cards and advertising asked the question about what disclosure was needed if any if a franchisor gave a franchisee a commission for sending him a buyer. Now many out there may not be too familiar with this, but then again you are not holding yourself out to well versed enough to charge $150-300 per hour for advice on such franchising subjects. This particular question totally infuriates me as a Franchisor, because I am to pay good money for these attorneys who block information from the public domain so they can sell it to me for the price described above. Yet these same people do not know the answer to the questions you ask, they instead call on other attorneys to answer such questions. Then may I ask why we pay them at all? And if you call them on it, and complain about their lack of knowledge they claim you are unprofessional.

Well if unprofessional means calling things the way they are then these two-faced attorneys are correct. In my opinion they are thieves, cowards and liars. They should shot and Caesar was correct in his statements as I am here today in this period. Entrepreneurs when they make mistakes pay for those mistakes in the market place. Attorneys wing it and hire paralegals to do all their work for peanuts and then bill you maximum rate. In franchising I would say the number of attorneys who purport such expert status to bill such high fees are generally morons.

Given that some are actually knowledgeable on their subject matter. Still the fees are way to high. But there are about 12% who know their stuff. The others need a Jerry Springer T-Shirt or a Jeff Foxworthy "Here's Your Sign". The answer to the above question is of course it is required for disclosure, my answer to this CA moron attorney (opinion) is "No, Keep it a Secret, don't disclose it?" DAH? It is a violation in my opinion and it is false and misleading to purport that you are an attorney specializing in some area of law and then not know the answers to fundamental questions in that area. For someone to put on a business card that they specialize in an area of law and hold themselves out to the public to be well versed and knowledgeable on the subject matter and to ask stupid questions that they should know the answer to is evidence in the need for on-going education, testing, and licensing of that area of law.

Attorneys seem to slip out of the categories in which other professionals such as Brokers, Accountants and Medical professionals must play in. Attorneys are therefore the most self-serving group of people on the Planet. Talk about calling the kettle black, these people sue franchisors and franchisees that are making a living by producing while these parasites steal your money and sit behind law books they have never read or use. They hire paralegals to do the work, they figure that if they do not know something they can find it, yet hide the information so you cannot find it, meaning you have to pay them to file paperwork. These attorneys file complaints and make up stuff in order to sue you and I and people who produce goods and services to this great nation. They often exaggerate issues and create barriers between parties where everyone loses, but alas, they get a G-Damn Fee. Fee for what, they are stupid well all but 12%. Now then we have many young Americans going back to school to get degrees in law? Oh great add more fuel to the fires and add more liars (lawyers).

The funniest part of this issue is that these morons cannot even argue the point, calling such observations of the system run a muck as unprofessional. Well when you are professional about it they cloud the issues with rhetoric and these word smiths sit around all day trying to figure out how to screw us all, so they can get theirs without working. Without knowledge, without ever having to produce one thing for America, except and invoice, which if you do not pay they will sue you? Whatever. The problem being that they hide behind a desk, never learning to the best of their ability the subject matter. Next time you are at a party and someone tells you they are a lawyer; tell them to go to hell. They deserve no respect, no professionalism and none of your time. Tell them to their face. Whether they are a politician, regulator, litigator or judge.

They system, regulations, sue happy lawyers are the reason the economy is in shambles. These lawyers reward laziness, lead in that regard by example, perpetually lie to clients, customers and the public in general using false and misleading advertising, could care less about right and wrong and should for the most part be hung or burned at the stake. You know this true. Look around folks; High insurance, medical, franchise fees, etc. Why do you think this is? Guess. Is it unprofessional to call an ace and ace and a spade a spade? Not where I come from.

I call and demand a complete revamping of franchise law, category of law where franchising is its own deal not mixed in with securities law; a crushing of duplication amongst states and the federal government. Re-education for all franchise attorneys mandatory, if they cannot learn what they should already know, they cannot practice franchise law. No Grandfather clauses, because in this area of law there are too many incompetent folks holding themselves out to be attorneys and do not understand the model or the dynamics. They (except for the 12%) are scoundrels, crooks, fraudsters, incompetent, and wannabes. (CYA-opinion). Recently when I wrote this attorney in CA and called him into check, He copied my email into the ABA Forum for other attorneys. Many stuck up for his views that it is okay to ask dumb questions (not the 12%, they simply kept quite, understood or agreed with my comments), although the real issue is that only incompetent people ask questions which are so fundamental that they ought to know by heart if they are to practice in this area of law.

During Franchising Week and we are to promote franchising, what a better way to promote franchising which delivers 1/3 of every consumer dollar spent then by deleting or calling into question the parasites the 88% of attorneys which plague our industry like a virus against humanity that threatens the economic stability of our nation worse than any potential international terrorist. By threatening to sue, when we should be working together to build a stronger unity and building small businesses through franchising for the betterment of the future of America and the laid off individuals which were forced out of work by lawyers in other fields suing and raising costs into oblivion. Today we have our troops being attacked and some occasionally killed to restore order in Iraq, yet in the US we have a worse threat than that, here, we have attorneys causing the crumble of America, for personal financial gain, without regard for the well being of the American people, these lawyers are the worst of all Terrorists, they are preventing America from getting back to work, they are immune to Patriot's Act know your client rules, they will take a check form anyone. They will defend guilty parties, they will file bogus claims against the hard working class of Americans, small business owners and franchisors who have delivered to all Americans, lower prices, competitive choices and smooth distribution, not to mention employing 38.44% of all Americans.

You want to keep America back to work? Hold those Lawyers responsible and if they cannot be responsible, SHOOT THEM, shovel them and shut up; stop listening to this rhetoric and playing with words. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out right and wrong, but all the lawyers in the world could not get themselves into agreement. The system of law, truth and justice is flawed because the lawyers have run a muck, are not held accountable, don't care (88% of them), stir controversy, avoid intent. It is obvious that the lawyers in the Franchising Field yield a huge chokehold on our society; from every aspect of franchise law. When someone asks these 88% what type of law they practice, typically they will smile and say, "well what is your problem?" Then they simply say yes we can help you with that here is the fee schedule and then quickly they get online to find the answer or pay someone else to look it up. Is that really fair to America. Franchising is a huge system of distribution and rivals Wal-Mart in efficiency.

If franchising were to leave tomorrow, you could not see a ball game, buy a car, eat out, buy gasoline, etc. And because this distribution system is so powerful America is so powerful. We have regulators who are lawyers who have no experience making a paycheck, little if any in franchise law, clogging the system. We have OSHA, EPA, Workmen's Comp, ADA, etc all areas with more lawyers. Franchises often involve real estate, the average re-finance paper work or real estate listing use to be 3-5 pages, today sixty. Franchise UFOCs with attachments usually 180 plus pages. Use to be 13 for UFOC and about 10-15 pages of various attachments. Lease agreements and Sub lease agreements use to be 5 pages not 55 pages. OSHA standards are 47 stories high are stacked on top of each other. Come on people, THINK. Think about it, what is the problem here. It is not that American Companies cannot compete in free markets; we are the ones, which refined them, used them to become victorious in two World Wars. If anyone knows free markets like Milton Friedman it is we, we practically created the modern free market and folks the biggest single factor and driving force of that modern force today is franchising. Not bunches of two-bit, fake it tell you make it, Boilerplate bandits, self-serving, three-piece suit parasites. Yet today we have Blood sucking giant mosquitoes, Lawyers, sucking us dry in swarms and then infecting us with the virus they call professionalism and law.

Societies exist because the human species is innately social by nature, not simply because of law. What we need to do is Genetically modify these lawyers to work for solutions, not create pages of What-ifs and case law based on arbitrary decision making of other lawyers who have graduated as the best ten gallon hat bull slingers into status as judges (again 88%). America can be fixed tomorrow and everyone can go back to work when the lawyers 88% of them get educated, terminate, die or get a life. Then there will be plenty of jobs for all Americans and the Lawyers, can work on the automated garbage trucks so they do not get their hands dirty. The whole world laughs at us, and the culprits are laughing too. But hey; they are very PROFESSIONAL, just ask them. I say so what, if someone is lying to your face and you are not allowed to call them on it, do you really care if they are lying professionally? I sure as hell don't. The hypocrisy has gone to far.

I am unconcerned what the Harvard Law School or these schools churning out 1000's of lawyers per year have to say about that, the fact is it is true. They are running the country and we must fight this now before we end up another has been on the list of great civilizations, which inhabited the Earth during the short history of modern homosapiens. I would rather not be part of a footnote in the evolutionary chain, which was unable to adapt and whose branch went no further. It is time to take control of the bull (pun intended) and wrestle this beast to the ground once and for all. Lets start with franchising, put America back to work, get this economy flying again and then we can weed out the other areas of law where parasitic lawyers abound. Care to comment on my opinion. Afraid too, chicken? Too unprofessional for you; Deal with it. Lawyers do not deserve our time, money or common courtesy. The time to stop playing games has fallen upon us, it is time to act decisively. Fight on Entrepreneurs; do not take anymore of this BS. This country was built on blood, sweat and tears, we have come to far to turn it over rhetoric of bunch of professional Lawyers. In my opinion they are scum of the Earth and you know I am right, why are you so afraid to say it? Might get sued? Think about it.




"Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is an online writer in retirement.




Monday, May 21, 2012

Top-Rated Trial Attorneys Reveal The Truth About Asset Protection


This article is not legal advice. The accuracy and applicability of the subject matter of this article changes on a daily basis. Laws are different in each state. By reading this article, you acknowledge and agree that you have read and understand all terms and conditions set forth in the disclaimer posted at our web site and incorporated herein. The disclaimer is set forth at http://www.jwcms.com/privacy

Introduction

Today's social and economic environment is more litigious than ever before. Theories of liability are expanding and across the U.S., jury awards are increasing. Not too long ago, million dollar verdicts were rare. Today, it's not uncommon to read about multi-million dollar verdicts (or more) on a weekly basis.

That's why it is so important that when doing business in today's ever changing business world, you must make sure that smart and intelligent decisions are made RIGHT NOW allowing you to avoid unnecessary claims and lawsuits tomorrow.

To take proper legal and ethical steps TODAY to protect your personal and business privacy and assets BEFORE a problem arises sometime in the future.

To setup a system that has YOUR BEST INTEREST IN MIND rather than the best interest of your insurance company or its defense attorneys.

As indicated at our web site, 9 out of 10 lawsuits in the world are filed in the United States. Statistics show that a new lawsuit is filed almost every 30 seconds.

Business owners and professionals have a 1 in 3 chance of being named as a defendant in a lawsuit over the next year. Individuals statistically will be sued 2 to 3 times over the course of their lifetime.

Other estimates show 50,000 new lawsuits are filed everyday with the costs of defense (regardless of merit) ranging from $5,000 for an individual involved in a small case to well in excess of $10,000,000 for larger companies named as defendants in product liability and national class action cases.

Several examples of both legitimate and frivolously lawsuits (obviously each case is unique in and of itself) might include...

Doctors- There are 13.9 malpractice claims for each 100 doctors. 4 out of 10 medical doctors have been sued. The average Obstetrician in New York has been sued eight times. Nationwide, the average jury verdict in medical malpractice cases is $1,333,000 and in New York, it is three times larger than the national average.

Accountants- Accounting firms now face over 3,000 suits each year seeking more than 13 billion in damages. Huge judgments are being obtained like the recent $338,000,000 judgment against Price Waterhouse. Several regional firms have gone bankrupt.

Investors- Every businessman, developer, business owner and board member is exposed. Liability is often based on emerging and unanticipated legal theories. For example, the partners in a major law firm were recently stunned when they were notified of their joint and several liability under CERCLA for the projected $72 million toxic clean-up cost on a parcel of raw land they bought in the early 1970's.

Now add the dollar amount of the verdicts...

Keep in mind that the above figures do not take into consideration the billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts that are paid out each year by businesses in the U.S. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that last year, more than $152 billion was paid to settle frivolous lawsuits. While we believe this figure is grossly overstated, and includes settlements of cases with merit, the point is that there really is no greater financial exposure which will result in permanent detrimental results than of being sued.

So, the real question is, "What type of events can lead to personal or business litigation?"

Events that could trigger liability exposure include...

Intentional acts which are not covered by liability insurance

Negligent acts (automobile accidents, premises liability...)

Dog Bites (strict liability in many states)

Breach of contract

Employment related disputes

Discrimination related claims

Professional malpractice

Business partner claims and lawsuits

Alter ego and piercing the corporation

Officer and Director liability

Promissory notes and personal guarantees

Personal and business creditors

State and Federal tax liability

Environmental law liability

Joint liability like owning a home in joint tenancy

Divorce

Unfortunately, we want our clients to understand that it's not a matter of if you get sued, it's WHEN. The question is, "what are YOU going to do about it?"

Now here's some information that you probably didn't know. Even if you do everything right but are at the receiving end of a large damages lawsuit, there are inherent conflicts in our insurance liability and defense system that place your best interest no higher than third on the priority list.

At the top is your insurance company. Next on the priority list are the insurance defense attorneys hired by your insurance company to protect your interest. And last on the list is you. Your "best interest" is superseded by your insurance company and defense attorney. Here's why.

Conflicts Exist In Our Current System

Whether you know it or not, most insurance companies and defense law firms have huge conflicts of interest concerning issues involving protecting your interest from claims and lawsuits while at the same time, maximizing their bottom line profits.

Insurance companies are in the business to make a profit. The less money they pay out in claims each year, the greater their annual profits. Defense attorneys hired by insurance companies to defend you or your company generally bill by the hour. The longer they "work" your file, the more money their law firm gets paid. There is absolutely no incentive by either the insurance company or defense attorney to place your interest before their own. In most states today, there are little, if any, "checks and balances" in place to protect your interest.

Problems We've Personally Seen With Insurance Companies...

Failing to properly and timely open your file and investigate the claim.

Failing to properly investigate the facts and analyze liability and damages issues.

Improperly interpreting policy coverage, amounts and exclusions.

Failing to simply and timely pay a claim.

Forcing you to try and first get the other person's insurance company to cover the claim rather than allowing you to deal with your own insurance in company as you're entitled to do.

Improperly raising your insurance premiums simply because you presented a claim under the terms of a policy that you have been paying premiums on for years "just in case" something like this ever happened to you... and the incident wasn't your fault.

Fraud and deception.

Failing to provide you with all the facts, options and proper counsel.

Requiring you to "jump through hoops" or provide documentation not required under the terms of your policy.

Denying your claim and arguing that it never received a premium payment from you after your submit a claim.

Implementing improper or unlawful schemes to decrease or eliminate your rights to pursue a claim.

Failing to keep you up-to-date on all important issues including settlement discussions

Failing to settle a case within your policy limits thereby unnecessarily exposing your personal and business assets to an excess policy coverage verdict.

Failing to resolve conflicts of interest- for example, the same claims person handling conflicting claims.

Improperly demanding reimbursement from you for money they paid out on your claim.

Problems We've Personally Seen With Defense Attorneys

Insurance companies may hire inexperienced or inadequate attorneys to try and protect your interest.

Giving you the impression that experienced partners are handling your defense when in fact, inexperienced associates are doing much, if not all, of the work.

Rather than quickly and timely resolving your case, the claim is dragged out over an extended period of time allowing the defense firm to heavily bill the file.

"Rolling the dice" at your expense- settlement offers are not communicated to you or, unrealistic promises of getting you a complete defense verdict are made. When the verdict comes back from the jury for an amount in excess of your policy, you are the one writing a check for the difference.

Overworked, understaffed and underpaid. Many associates are given caseloads which are simply too large to effectively handle. We constantly run into defense attorneys who are answering "ready" for trial on a Monday morning on three different cases in three different courtrooms.

In all of these instances, you should ask yourself, "who's best interest is being served?"

Real Case Examples- Still skeptical. Read several "real case" examples from our personal files...

Insurance company intentionally misrepresented and interpreted important facts against its own insured

Our client was hit head on by a drunk driver who was drag racing another vehicle. The drunk driver was uninsured.

Our client sustained serious injuries including broken bones and serious head trauma. His medical bills were about $100,000.00.

After we were retained, our client's own insurance company told us that he only had $30,000.00 in insurance coverage. Furthermore, based upon their review of the file, that was more than enough to cover the value of the case.

Our independent review of our client's written insurance policy indicated to us that there was actually $1,000,000.00 of available insurance. Furthermore, our client and his family had been paying large insurance premiums to this insurance company for more than a decade with the impression that they had the $1,000,000.00 in coverage.

Our instincts told us that something was wrong with how this claim was being handled and we filed a first party bad faith lawsuit against the insurance company to protect our client's legal rights. We asked for copies of our client's insurance claims file and the insurance company refused. Only after threatening to bring a motion to have a Superior Court Judge order the files be produced and for an award of monetary sanctions were the files finally disclosed.

What we learned blew us away.

In the files were letters and memorandums indicating that the insurance company's own lawyers valued this case at a figure substantially higher than the insurance companies earlier $30,000.00 offer. The file also contained written documentation that the insurance company had earlier consulted with an accident reconstruction expert who confirmed that the cause of this accident was the negligent operation of an automobile by the other driver.

To our surprise, a follow-up reference was found in the file stating that if the insurance company discounted their own expert's earlier opinion and instead retained a new expert who (for a price) would point the finger at their own insured (our client) for causing this accident, it could save the insurance company a ton of money.

We put our team to work and eventually obtain a binding uninsured motorist arbitration award for our client in the amount of $865,000.00 and a subsequent insurance bad faith settlement for another $2,500,000.00. The total claim was resolved for $3,365,000.00. Remember, this is after our client was originally offered only $30,000.00 by his own insurance company.

And here are two more real cases.

Policy Limits Misrepresented by $1,800,000.00!

In two separate cases involving tragic wrongful death traffic accident claims, we were told by the insurance claims adjuster over the telephone that the only insurance coverage available for our clients' families was $100,000.00 for each accident.

After litigating each case and conducting discovery (forcing the insurance companies to turn over all documents and their insured to answer questions under oath), we discovered that in fact, there was $1,000,000.00 in liability coverage resulting in an additional $900,000.00 of coverage per claim. Both of these claims were then subsequently resolved for the full policies.

New Privacy Concerns...

The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on October 26, 2001. As a result, new agreements, laws and treaties with foreign governments have opened up the doors to the free exchange of information that was once difficult to obtain and extremely confidential in nature. Without discussing personal views on whether or not this Act was the right thing to do, as we understand the Act, several important facts are as follows:

It grants the FBI broad access to individual and business records without evidence of a crime.

Surveillance laws have been broadly expanded (wiretaps, search warrants, pen/trap orders and subpoenas).

"Secret searches" are authorized.

"Roving" wiretaps are authorized.

Telephone and internet communication surveillance rights of police departments are broadened.

Right now, attorneys and investigators can access databases giving them information about your:

Voter registration records

Medical records

Telephone records

Business and personal checking account information

Property tax records

Driving records

Social Security number

Workers' compensation information

Police records

Court records

Real estate records

Fictitious business name and licensing records

Corporate records

Marriage records

Utility records

Credit card records

Family history records

Probate records

The average consumer is simply not aware of the financial exposure lawsuits can bring and, the lack of privacy that exists in this country today. People's best interest are placed after the defense attorneys and insurance companies and personal and business assets are unnecessarily exposed.

And that's where we come in.

Jackson & Wilson Consulting and Manages Services, LLC was founded to help individuals, entrepreneurs, small business owners, large companies (including officers and directors), services organizations and professionals (doctors, lawyers, accountants...) minimize exposure to lawsuits and maximize privacy and asset protection.

To offer products and services designed to protect you and your business with a strong emphasis on specific, constructive and objective solutions, by seasoned and experienced trial attorneys, showing you how to MINIMIZE your liability exposure and MAXIMIZE your personal and professional privacy and, the protection of your personal and business assets.

So, what can you do next to protect your family and business?

Proper Steps Taken Today Can Maximize The Protection Available To You, Your Family and Business From Future Claims and Litigation

Developing new business revenues, prospects and clients should be at the top of every businesspersons list. At the same time, legitimately protecting your privacy, personal and professional assets must also be a main priority.

How do you go about this?

First, you need to know that most of what you know or have been told about "asset protection" is probably wrong. Although we hate to be the bearer of bad news, the reality of the situation is that now is the time to find this out, not later after you or your business is being sued by a talented trial attorney who you watch walk through your layers of asset protection as easily as one would peel back the layers of an onion. An experience that is not necessarily limited to bringing tears to your eyes.

Fact No. One: There are no "asset protection" specific laws or statutes under State or Federal law. For example, in California, we have a Vehicle Code which controls the operation of vehicles. We have a Business and Professions Code which controls how you do business. There are no "Asset Protection" Codes or Statutes which describe or control how you can avoid having your assets taken by a creditor.

Fact No. Two: Most of the tools and concepts offered in the "Asset Protection" seminars you read about in various advertisements found in the Sports or Business sections of your local newspaper are worth no more than the piece of paper the ad was printed on.

Most of these seminars are given by people with little, if any, legal background. The alleged benefits and protection which are inaccurately, but effectively hyped with all the bells and whistles, are for the most part, completely ineffective for purposes of asset and privacy protection.

State and Federal Judges will normally use concepts or equity and fairness when determining whether or not a good faith creditor should be paid for provided products or services and will not simply disregard money you have stashed in a Family Limited Partnership, Nevada Corporation, or Off-Shore Trust to avoid creditors.

And while you may argue to a Federal Judge that all of your assets are in an Off-Shore Trust beyond her control, he will remind you while you are standing in front of her that your failure to turn over your assets would result in you being in-contempt of court and that you can continue to assert your argument from inside a federal jail cell.

Furthermore, remember the USA Patriot Act which expanded the amount of information now available to the government.

What You Can Do...

To effectively, legally and ethically survive in today's litigious environment, you must be smart about

1. How you make decisions;

2. How you setup and manage your personal and professional life;

3. How you hold and manage your personal and business assets.

An overall plan must be designed and put into place which incorporates a combination of proper estate and succession, financial, business, risk management, liability insurance, asset preservation/ protection and tax planning. By necessity, it must involve a comprehensive approach to establish and then manage your personal and professional life in such a way as to maximize the ultimate transfer of your estate to your heirs while at the same time, minimizing liability risk thereby preserving and protecting your assets.

Here's One Proven Approach You May Want To Take A Close Look At...

Step No. One- Use a "Private Consulting Attorney."

Set up a system to allow you to make smart and informed decisions. You establish a win-win professional relationship with a "private consulting attorney" who has no financial connection to your partners, board of directors, liability insurance company, any of the defense law firms "on retainer" with the insurance company.

All important business decisions, documents and contracts are reviewed with your "private consulting attorney" before decisions are made and documents signed. We can't begin to tell you how many major lawsuits could have easily been avoided had this initial step been routinely followed.

An additional benefit of private counsel is that decisions are made in your best interest as opposed to the best interest of insurance companies and defense firms.

Important Attorney/Client Privilege- Another important reason to use a "private consulting attorney" is the strict confidential privilege with any communications between you and your attorney. This relationship is a "must have" in order to maximize all legal and ethical confidential attorney-client communications. The only way to invoke the well established attorney-client privilege is to properly retain an experienced and qualified attorney to assist you with the concepts discussed herein. Your professional relationship with an accountant or any other non-lawyer, although critically valuable and important, WILL NOT invoke the important "attorney-client" privilege.

Why is this important? Because absent the "attorney-client" privilege, a court or creditor can force your non-legal adviser to disclose all information, notes and documents associated with the establishment and existence of your plan. Your discussions, ideas and concerns all become a matter of public record. Not a good idea.

Subject to all "attorney-client" privileges, your private attorney will review your personal and business situation and determine your unique potential creditor exposure. Past, present and future challenges and issues are review and analyzed. Special forms can be used to streamline this initial process.

If you find yourself in the middle of unavoidable litigation, your "private consulting attorney" can be the educated professional holding your hand and looking over everyone's shoulders to make sure ALL insurance decisions are made with your best interest in mind. He or she will also be able to "review" the efforts of defense counsel resulting in you getting top-notch legal representation as opposed to the services of a first year inexperienced defense attorney.

Believe it or not, other steps can be taken by private counsel to maximize the chances of any excess verdict (a trial verdict for more than your policy limits) actually being paid by your insurance company. About 12 years ago, we had such a case resulting in an insurance company being obligated to pay more than $950,000.00 more than the written policy limits. In another case, more than $200,000.00 was paid out above the policy limits.

Step No. Two- Set and manage your business using the correct business entity.

Before taking personal or business actions, make sure you are doing so under the protection of the correct business entity. For example, when setup and used correctly, Corporations and LLC's can offer you certain tax and liability advantages that simply are not available when acting in your individual capacity.

Your best choice for the specific type of entity may directly depend on the type of activity or business you are planning to conduct. Also related to choice may be short and long-term tax, retirement and estate planning considerations. It may be best to use a combination of different entities for different assets and projects, depending on your unique circumstances.

Depending on your individual needs, various tools and approaches can be put into action to maximize such a plan. These include but are not limited to Insurance (liability, disability, life, D&O, business loss), Corporations (Nevada, Delaware, domestic and foreign), International Business Companies or Corporations (IBC), Collateralization, Trusts (revocable, irrevocable, domestic, international, spendthrift, domestic asset protection trust, foreign asset protection trust), LLC (charging order protection LLC, Delaware Series LLC, Offshore LLC's), ERISA Plans (anti-alienation provisions), Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP), IRAs SEP IRAs, Keogh's, Private and Public Pension Plans, Annuities, Extreme LLC, Xesop (complex arrangement for holding an operating business which combines an ESOP with an Xtreme LLC), Homestead and Creditor Exemptions, Family Limited Partnerships (charging order protection) and Management/ Leasing Companies.

Different entities may be used to segregate different assets. And when it comes to allocating liability risk, different business entities can be used to separate companies and liability arguments.

Step No. Three- Setup and manage an estate plan.

Now that you have a good start on the proper way to run your business, generate wealth and legitimately minimize tax liability, you need to make sure that you have an effective plan to pass on your estate to your heirs. Not only will proper estate planning guarantee that your heirs, and not the state or federal government will receive the bulk of your estate, but in many cases, you can avoid probate and minimize taxes. Concepts and options to review would include one or more of the different entities described in step two above.

An indirect result of proper estate planning techniques is that in your planning, you may also create certain privacy and asset protection devices. Benefits which on their own, might be subject to being tossed aside by a Federal Judge. But if part of a legitimate estate plan, these same benefits may very well be preserved and interpreted as simply a secondary benefit to a valid primary estate plan.

Step No. Four- Obtain proper insurance.

The basic, but important issue as to whether or not you have proper and adequate insurance coverage is reviewed. Remember, when used with the additional services of your "private counsel," liability insurance benefits can be maximized.

Depending on your personal and professional needs, entities and estate plan, insurance coverage to review might include homeowners, auto, umbrella, commercial, directors and officers, disability and life. Each entity may require different insurance choices and amounts.

Step No. Five- Maximize creditor exemptions.

Creditor exemptions should be maximized. What we mean by this is that certain state and federal statutes actually provide an almost "bulletproof" shield allowing you to protect various significant assets.

For example, in different states, certain retirement plans (for example, ERISA anti-alienation provisions) and accounts (IRA, Keoghs, public pension plans, county employee pension plans...) may be protected from creditors. Life insurance and annuities (for example, may require a clause which prohibits proceeds from being used to pay the beneficiary's creditors) may also afford a level of protection. Homestead exemptions also may provide exemptions depending on your state and circumstances. In California and as of 2004, several homestead exemptions are $50,000 for a single person, $75,000 for a couple and $125,000 if 65 or older.

Depending on your particular situation, the type of entity you are doing business under may provide you with the ability to annually contribute to an exempted retirement account certain funds that a creditor may not be able to touch in the future. Combining this protection with legitimate estate planning tools and these funds may be able to pass to your heirs free and clear from attachment by creditors. Furthermore, certain exemptions built into estate planning tools (like a QTIP trust) also play a factor in passing wealth along to your heirs without creditor intervention.

Step No. Six- Utilize advanced products and services.

If necessary and appropriate, use more sophisticated privacy and asset protection products and services. Other alternatives to further legitimate business and estate planning goals, while as a bi-product, providing privacy and asset protection, may include the use of various out-of-state corporations, off-shore business corporations and off-shore trust. At this level, a combination of one or more of the above tools are normally utilized to best serve the client's interest.

Under the right circumstances, many of these entities can offer excellent benefits associated with legitimate business and estate planning needs. Additionally, they may offer outstanding privacy and asset protection levels offering various forms of legal and geographical privacy barriers.

Summary

In summary, and looking at the above six steps from a slightly different perspective, a properly established plan is a combination of proper estate and succession, financial, business, risk management, liability insurance, asset preservation/protection and tax planning.

It is a comprehensive approach to establish and then manage your personal and professional life in such a way as to maximize the ultimate transfer of your estate to your heirs while at the same time, minimizing liability risk, thereby preserving and protecting your assets.

A properly established and managed plan requires constant review and modification depending upon your personal and professional needs and, changing state, federal and international laws.

A properly established and managed plan is designed using established laws, to make it extremely difficult, inconvenient and in some instances, impossible, for someone to know what business and assets you have... or don't have.

A properly established and managed plan must not be established to hide income or avoid paying legitimate income taxes. However, it may be created and implemented to take advantage of legitimate and established tax laws to minimize or eliminate certain tax consequences.

A properly established and managed plan helps you avoid personal and professional litigation or if the initiation of litigation is beyond your control, promotes an early amicable and fair settlement within your insurance liability policy limits.

A properly established and managed plan will, from the very beginning, have a proper, legitimate, legal, ethical and moral purpose. Otherwise, most judges will allow a creditor access to your assets.

Despite what slick, uninformed non-lawyer seminar presenters are advertising and promoting across the country, judges will not normally tolerate an "asset protection plan" that doesn't look, taste or smell right. A plan that is setup for all the wrong reasons like tax evasion and fraudulent asset conveyance. "Real world" judges will rarely issue a ruling or order resulting in a debtor being allowed to defraud creditors.

A properly established and managed plan absolutely requires an attorney-client relationship in order to invoke the confidential "attorney-client" privilege. Only after the important attorney-client relationship is established will other experts and consultants such as other attorneys, accountants, retirement plan experts and tax specialist be utilized, in proper format, to plan, establish and manage your plan.

The most important aspect of a correctly implemented plan is to make smart and informed personal and professional decisions which will help minimize or completely avoid legal and ethical mistakes and litigation in the first place. The best plan possible is one that is never put into use because the need never arises.

With the above in mind, smart people will take action right now to begin an overall analysis of their personal and professional "situation" in order to determine what steps they need to take to minimize their exposure to lawsuits and to maximize their estate planning, privacy and asset protection.

We've provided you with a great deal of information and want you to know that we are available to answer any questions you may have with respect to the information in this article.

P.S.- Important Tip: If a claim or lawsuit is filed before you have taken steps to properly setup and manage your plan, your options, if any, will be extremely limited because of a set of laws commonly referred to as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act (UFTA). This act allows a creditor to challenge a transfer of assets to pay an obligation owed to the creditor.

To be protected, you must properly setup and manage your plan well before any "hint" of a problem. Give us a call if you would like more information or to get started today!

Jackson & Wilson Consulting and Manages Services, LLC was founded to help individuals, entrepreneurs, small business owners, large companies (including officers and directors), services organizations and professionals (doctors, lawyers, accountants...) minimize exposure to lawsuits and maximize privacy and asset protection.




Southern California Office (Main Office) 23161 Mill Creek Drive, Suite 150 Laguna Hills, California 92653 Tel No. 949.855.8751 Fax No. 949.855.8752 Toll Free 800-661-7044 Email: admin@jwcms.com Web: http://www.jwcms.com

Northern California Office 2489 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, Suite 25 Lake Tahoe, CA 96150